Believe it or not, but the opposite is actually true. Leagues actual do better nationally with a dominant force. It might be a bit counter-intuitive, but think about the history of the pros. Just recently, the Bulls dynasty of the mid 90's was loved by all. The Yankees dynasty at the turn of the century galvanized…

Clue style.

***HOT TAEK ALERT***

Querrey is the answer!

You’re right. I’m a little blasted from watching game. My fault.

I agree. Though technically they won their Round of 16 in extra time.

You may be missing the second part of the joke.

If anyone can show Trump how to force his way into Washington, it’s gonna be Mike Tyson.

ICELAND! RIGHT OF NET!

What is the criteria? Otherwise, I must say you failed in your nominees.

The reign in Spain stays mainly in the past.

Because you also have to be in the play for the offsides to be called. Though a case can be made, that by flinching, he definitely was close enough to be shielding/interfering with the shot.

I was going to say same. It wasn’t just that one pick, it was all the ramifications after.

Las Vegas Redskins.

Title should read sports he would dominate tomorrow. Taking up football today, would mean a Cleveland Brown stint. And no one excels there.

Might as well take the selfie, he already had the frame.

They have. I believe there are already rules in place. And if you win back to back, the ring can get bigger.

They do. It's called inherited runners.

Shear delight.

If refs aren't going to stop a game for an apparent injury, shouldn't they have at least called Love for a defensive three-second violation?