Let’s take it into the corporate space and see if it’s still holds the same acceptance.

That’s not “AI art”, that’s straight-up AI plagiarism.

It’s not just ‘viewing artwork’, though. It’s ingesting it and creating something from it. Even art posted under a creative commons license requires attribution when derivative works are created using it - AI doesn’t attribute its sources. The only art that AI could use without it being considered theft is work that’s…

The most interesting part of this article, by far, is the comment section. I’m honestly not sure where I stand. But damned if I haven’t left here with a lot to mull over.

It may not be stealing in a technical sense, but I think calling it “no different than a human getting inspiration from other artists’ work” is also pretty disingenuous.

That was a lot of words to you?

If the AI developer is using someone else’s art in any way for commercial practice and monetary gain, it is still using someone else’s work without their permission in a manner not agreed upon. There’s no law stating specifically “AI art no use people art for make gooder”, but it’s still taking someone else work and…

My point was that in this world there are a few people who have managed to eke out a living making art. In truth, getting paid for art is not necessarily my ideal, but given our current reality we should not be closing doors on the few people who might manage to make money and art at the same time. If a company like…

You’re the one who doesn’t understand these algorithms. You’re equating human brains and agency with what is essentially a series of instructions for literally just filing the serial numbers off things humans have created (and sometimes even failing to do that) and mashing it together.

simply because it is allowed does not mean it is ethical

inspiration is different from scraping

Security camera footage:

I think it’s because your name starts with Thunder, but all of a sudden popping into my head is “Aquadome - two fish enter, all fish leave.”

“AquaDom is temporarily closed because...there is no AuqaDom anymore.”

I have really zero interest on Warhammer, but it is fascinating to see someone who loves and respects the IP get involved in such a project. Are they going to give him control? And if they do, is the source material good enough for a series? And they do and it is, is it going to be good? I may not watch it, but I hope…

“On its website, the aquarium announced that the AquaDom was temporarily closed due to the recent destruction.”

Joining the master list of “least necessary announcements in history.”

Excuse me, not small hands, tiny hands(c).

Nonsense. Bone spurs available separately. Never miss a chance to up-sell.

Hair Force One

G.I. Joke.