happyjam7
happyjam7
happyjam7

And they paid higher tax rates!

Corporate cronyism =/= free market. Huge difference there.

Amazon:

The rich pay to change the laws to their benefit. Average Americans have little say on corporate taxes and tax loopholes.

Indeed, “industry disruption” is the techy marketing term for, “If we ignore labor, tax, and whatever other laws we feel like, business is more profitable for us and the shareholders.”

Fuck Luxembourg, the goddamn dime-store knockoff Liechtenstein.

He’s so rich he’s literally asking for ideas on how to spend his money, while his employees can’t survive without government aid. This is what happens when you let the free market determine what people are worth.

Look at Rambo over here.

“I really believe I’d run in there even if I didn’t have a weapon.”

Isn’t this the same guy who cowered in fear during a pre-election campaign speech when someone came within 20 feet of him?

Came here looking to see if anyone had made this comment yet: “It seems to me that if you’re going to collate a bunch of these pictures into an article, you should really put a little bit of effort into naming each character...

I am not too keen on the “teen” titan over there.

Was it this one?

I couldn’t get over that large white man about to pop a vein and yelling over everyone. That one older woman said “I can say Merry Christmas again!” and the laughter was sweet. It was overall very cringeworthy, though.

So, I turned off her 60 Minutes roundtable thing because it was ridiculous because we’re giving Trump voters too much time on television as it is. How many more goddamn stories can we do about why people voted for Trump and why is this still even a question?

Also proven effective in preventing mass shootings: stricter gun laws. Let’s go with that one first, then address the media.

So we CAN count on progressives to step up and vote, even if the candidate doesn’t score 100% on the purity test and “inspire” them?

It’s pretty well established that conservative causes choose their female spokespersons by criteria that don’t require them to be personable (or, for that matter, particularly knowledgeable or honest). They want girls who are as combative as they are fuckable—and they better be very combative.

Think about this for a second. Dana Loesch is NRA spokesperson because she was THE MOST PERSONABLE INDIVIDUAL THEY COULD FIND TO DEFEND THEIR BULLSHIT.

I don’t believe in god, but if I did I would say, “God bless these kids.”