It doesn’t look like a $50k vehicle, inside or out. And the comment of getting real world 19 mpg is pretty bad. That’s worse than full size truck mpg.
It doesn’t look like a $50k vehicle, inside or out. And the comment of getting real world 19 mpg is pretty bad. That’s worse than full size truck mpg.
I found Jalopnik a few years ago searching for Chinese knockoffs of real cars. There was an article with an amazing GIF of a knockoff 4 door beetle with “lol nothing matters” plastered on it.
Oh my word, I want to make this tonight.
Every car with crappy AT tires, 1" coil spring spacers and a roof top tent is an overlander now.
That lesbians drive Subarus.
Those specs are very impressive, especially for 1990. That must’ve been a monster.
Nope, you’re wrong. Not funny. Sorry about your taste.
Stupid autocorrect!
For me, the second a car has to leave my residence, I might as well sell it. It’s not gonna get the use it deserves. It’s not gonna get washed. It’s going to go to shit. At least if it’s at my house, I have to look at it and feel bad about it. I only have 2 cars, both at my house, and even then, one of them is…
I thought that was a weird argument to make, too.
There is not a car made that doesn’t look better with quality, tasteful aftermarket rims and a mild lowering.
It’s not as good, but I do like it, too. In an ironic 70's kind of way.
In 1980, my parents brought me home from the hospital in one of these. It was later traded for a J-body Chevy Cavalier. Some quality car choices going on.
They did the same thing in 1968 with the California Special, High Country Special, and there were a few more. Literally just a side vent.
The pricing is bonkers when you consider a Yamaha Viking starts at under $14k. And there are off-brand side by sides at Lowes for under $10k.
Okay, I won’t.
I have zero dog in this fight, being I don’t care about this one nor the old one.
E-GiMP?