No way, David. Autos are cool and all, but they’re very, very simple compared to engines and manuals.
No way, David. Autos are cool and all, but they’re very, very simple compared to engines and manuals.
I’ve seen a single Jeep 4.0 L6 go through 4 chassis in 25 years before it...well it didn’t die, it just got hydrolocked by the final owner’s incompetence then scrapped.
On a classic Jeep Cherokee with the bulletproof 4.0 inline six, miles almost don’t matter. It’s a bit like the bean dip I’ve had in the back of my fridge since... *shrugs*...
$2600 is “fuck it, NP” territory, and she’s in decent condition even with the high mileage.
I say this with all due respect (and I find you amazing David), but you never include “current owner” when listing what’s wrong with your newest Jeep Heap.
That is fantastic. He hasn’t done anything to it that can’t be undone by future owners he’s just using the car for exactly what it was designed and built for and that is really really good.
This is fantastic.
Now thats a gentleman, look and learn kids.
Ayrton Senna may be Formula 1's God, but Sir Jackie is Formula 1's Patron Saint.
Now that’s a class act.
When I grow up, I wanna be like Sir Jackie Stewart.
The epitome of class. Sir, indeed.
Yes, many relatively pedestrian modern cars probably can give a 348 a run for its money. Back in the 80s, an MR2 could match the performance of a 308.
Also for the look, the engine sound and the General wow factor.
You are absolutely correct.
Regardless of how fast it really is, when you care about drag races in a (somewhat) vintage sports car you're doing it wrong. Who cares how fast a car like this is in a straight line compared to something from 2019? That's not why you buy an old sports car.
That dude has seen some shit, man.
I didn’t know Durham had a Russian enclave.
Me, every time these articles/videos show up: “This is getting old.”