hammerdown32
Hammerdown
hammerdown32

Article: Talk about rear of cars.

I bitched before that no one wrote up the excellent Watkins Glen cup race, but that’s probably for the best since this has to be one of the most ignorant comment sections when anything NASCAR is involved.

“Hurr durr ain’t really STOCK is it”

This is such a garbage take and I am sick of seeing it on this website. No top tier racing series would ever consider running OE body equipment because it could never be made safe enough to get an insurance company to underwrite the series.

If you want ‘stock cars racing’, go watch

His comment on how Harley appears to be doing this as cheaply as possible is astounding to me. WHAT THE HELL IS CHEAP ABOUT ENTERING HALF-A-DOZEN NEW MARKET SPACES AT THE SAME TIME? Each bike they’ve shown looks like they share little to no components with existing products. Does he understand the tooling costs that

I think the impact of the used market is key here, and what debunks comparisons to brands like Cadillac. You can put a 30 year old Caddy next to a brand new one, and nobody they’re targeting will mistake the CTS-V for the ‘88 Brougham. But with a HD? Plop an ‘88 Super Glide with the paint shined up next to a 2018

Yeah but crapping on H-D brings the clickety clicks.

That’s a Dyna, not a Sportster.

I’m sure I will be in the minority, but the Pan America “adventure” bike looks pretty cool. I imagine it will do relatively well as most GS bikes are just used for highway commuting (while seeing the occasional fire road).

The main reason that people (including myself) forget names is that they don’t “remember” to remember them.
We’ve all had this happen to us: “Hey Chris, meet my cousin, Steve. He’s an engineer who worked on part of the launch system for SpaceX. He’s a competitive powerlifter and in his spare time he illustrates kids

Yeah, this seems more like getting a “body in white” car from a manufacturer and then being allowed to put whatever engine you want in it and still register it as a new vehicle.  Not sure why trucks should be allowed to get away with that when nobody else can.

The turn 7-8-9 complex actually would take away a passing zone and turn it into more of an F1-parade than anything. Low-speed corners in succession do not create passing zones, just look at turns 5 though 14 at Bahrain in 2010, drivers complained about it being “Mickey Mouse” and very single-file.

Dirt late models are cooler.

2300 lbs, more downforce, 6x the suspension technology, 300 more HP, and sideways at 100+ while 20 of them are door to door

All these haters of NASCAR in the comments... I dont get it!

When there are so many more legitimate things to hate another human being for, like chewing with their mouth open or their opinion about whether contractions count in Scrabble..... why pick skin tone?


If she can do the job, great..... but as I don’t give the slightest shit about melanin levels, gender or anything else

no one thinks these cares are anything close to a real car. just like no one thinks a corvette DP car is a corvette or a mustang funny car is a mustang.

Question for the “ITS NOT A REAL SUPRA ITS JUST A TUBE FRAME WITH A SHELL” people; are you the same ones who, when someone mentions they like pro wrestling feel the need to tell them “You know it’s fake, right?”

A Toyota Supra NASCAR

When I was club racing motorcycles at Brainerd we had no speed limit on pit road. During the Endurance race you could easily hit 100mph on pit road. It was pit lane speed limits and other artificial items that gradually steered me away from F1 and NASCAR.

Several years ago I watched Kyle Busch bounce off the wall coming out of nearly every turn at Darlington. I thought there was no way he would finish, let alone win. He won. I don’t understand why so many insist on trying to hold one form of racing to the standards of another. It was a fun finish and neither driver

I should really give NASCAR another chance.