I support Ron Perlman regardless.

That’s a nice movie studio you got there. Be a shame if something were to happen to it. 

I don’t know. “There are a lot of ways to lose your house” is just... a statement of fact. He’s only pointing out a true thing that all of us, execs or not, should know.

Start the hug at the neck.

I’ve had such a big crush on this man for a decade, and he hasn’t let me down yet.

Yeah, let’s all listen to a wealthy member of a generation that has basically fucked over all subsequent generations in so many ways.

I would guess that he’s referring to The Great Wall. It was a stinker that bombed hard domestically (it did do well overseas including in China as it was made there and was a Chinese production, but overall I think it lost money).

If it were Dolly Parton, we’d be at war with France right now.

The other director?

Yeah. ALL the jokes are 40 years old.

“People thought it was hilarious; they screamed with laughter,” he said. “Well, nobody is going to be shocked now. The joke is 40 years old.”

He comes off as a slightly less assholish Chevy Chase.

Sisu is basically a pissed off Finnish dude playing a campaign from a the old WW2 Medal of Honor game in god mode for 90 minutes , he’s this mute unkillable force that just kills wave after wave of retreating Nazi’s who stole his gold claim , and it is Glorious.

“I don’t know what happens when people get corrupted,” says former drug trafficker Tim Allen.

These movies are literally written for children, that is to say to get the 16+ demographic. They’re fun popcorn munchers and not much else. Not liking them is perfectly fine and liking them is indeed a bit childish. But that’s ok be childish, but lets not pretend these are art school films that are hard to decipher…

That’s an awful, completely wrong take from Nolan and I hope it was just some loose conversation in a promotional interview. There was a concern during the Manhattan Project that the atomic bomb would ignite the atmosphere. Certainly this should feature in the movie. But the concern was based on a miscalculation by a…

Heh. I remember a coworker recommended it. After I watched it, I realized that I really shouldn’t take his recommendations on comedy any more.

As with so many of these things one wonders precisely who it is for.

If the thing most worth talking about with regards to Picasso’s art is the misogyny of the artist it ought not be displayed in the first place. If you wanted to discuss the misogyny in relation to his art’s immense cultural impact that ought to have…

I can’t remember the context of the Picasso criticism in Nanette, but mostly what I remember about that special is trying to explain why I hated it as nicely as possible to the person who *very* enthusiastically showed it to me.

All billionaires are morally reprehensible, so it's okay for me to work with any of them?