Considering we are going to see a gazillion of these over the next few years, I’ll take bland over ugly. 

Power boost is what they are calling the hybrid engine.

A lot of demonic possessions in early seasons. Can definitely tell the series started out during the ‘Satanic Cult‘ panic era.

So I’m guessing just like the original the cold cases will be interesting and the paranormal stuff will be a total snoozefest. 

Have you seen the price of the Arteon? I love the car but think you have to be insane to actually purchase one.

Yes, as an American who daily drove a 2015 Golf (that’s a mk7 for those unsure of when that gen started in US) for 5 years the “quirkiness” of the European-market focused VWs is vastly overstated. They are not very quirky at all. Maybe slightly premium in fit and finish compared to some competitors? Yes. But not…

The normal Arteon is a “5 door hatch” too though. 

Early YJ Wranglers did in fact start around 9k back in late 80s (adjusted for inflation that is around $20k). Of course that is ignoring that they didn’t come with back seats, AC, an FM radio (let alone anything like a cassette player) and other things we pretty much expect nowadays standard.

Of course. What you are suggesting is akin to saying people breaking the law should be allowed to sue the 911 caller in court because they had the audacity to report a crime you were committing.

A lot of classic styling does not necessarily work well with modern crash and especially pedestrian safety standards. 

Two of the three cars you mentioned are dead in the US, and never sold in any significant volume. Doesn’t really counter his argument that small cars are DOA in the US.

That is the exact example Gorsuch used further down in his opinion. If you have two employees both attracted to men, and are completely the same in the eyes of the employer (ie job performance) other than their gender then by firing someone because they are gay means you naturally are taking sex of employee into…

The opening paragraphs are not any better. Trying to link current events to a movie just because it happens to have a cop as the main character, especially a 45 year old movie, is just stupid.

You are in one thread trying to argue that gender won’t be a factor, and then in this thread arguing that voters vote twice, splitting their votes between two different genders. That is making gender a factor. If you are splitting it up so much it comes to a point where you have to ask, why not have a male category…

That’s “feel good“ inclusion that actually changes nothing. You are still forcing them to consider gender, just at the backend instead of upfront. 

I didn’t watch the video (because I don’t care enough to sit and listen to a video) but from the excerpt it’s not like she was putting down everyone working on the movie (in fact she said it was a great group of people), she just said the weather made her miserable.

Who decides the gender? Are we now expecting the organization hosting the award to determine their gender? Or can say Chris Pratt suddenly decide he is non-binary for a better shot at winning an award when facing stiff male competition?

If the two winners can’t be the same gender what is the point of merging them into a gender neutral category? By simple statistics and probability a majority of the winners would be one man and one woman, as non-binary actors are a distant minority. The whole rational is to eliminate gender distinction in the awards.

To be fair the suggestion that she was in poverty seems to be more Jezebel nonsense (who long have had an issue admitting when they are wrong or that certain women are in fact probamatic to say the least, and not everything is black or white) than White nonsense.

I mean what do you expect? ‘Robots’ are not sentient beings- they are only as good as the data that is fed to them. If there is bias in that data (intentional or not) it will be reflected in the output.