Nothing wrong? She sold out our government to the highest bidders and laundered the money through her “foundation”. She is a terrible candidate. And so is Trump. There are other, more honorable options, like the Green Party and Libertarian party candidates.

Added sugar is one thing, but fruit? No, no, no.

Hillary supporters are an embarrassment. She’s a corrupt & awful candidate that squeaked out a primary win based on name recognition & collusion with the DNC. Too many low information voters who just want to see a woman become POTUS.

Libertarian (Former Republican) here. Voting for the third option. I cannot and will not vote for Hillary and I cannot and will not vote for Trump. Rather then abstain, I’m voting for the only candidate that isn’t a total nut bar.

The big point is is that she was told not to do this as it’s a risk to national security, yet here we are. Either she didn’t care or didn’t understand, both of which are disheartening.

At least the Republican party had the guts to roll 16 total flipping candidates out there in the primary... AND stood there and took it, didnt pull any shenanigans at the convention, when 14 million nitwits decided to nominate the kookiest orange haired wacko in the bunch.

The classified email system is separate from the normal State email servers. The problem here was that classified material was sent on an unclassified system, just because it was more convenient. But the reason it’s been dragged out for 3+ years is that it was on a private server not subject the the normal Federal…

People with this opinion scare me, the whole “I don’t care what she did, I still don’t care.” This opinion fucking frightens me

How this type of email would go down at my workplace:

I guess that time at McKinsey paid off.

“I don’t endorse the way the majority of Jez authors respond to commenters — in fact it pisses me off — but I would say they are all short tempered and defensive.”

My excuse is that I was banned from Jez for posting a gif of Belushi smashing that guy's guitar from Animal House. Granted, it was around the time of the UVA thing. But years later one of the Jez writers used the same still. Go figure. I don't talk shit, though. (or at least I don't think I do.)

Honestly, I know they fly off the handle at dumb things and seem petty about commenters but if they really, truly had thin skins about all this, they would all have quit after a week on the job.

I’m not saying the issue isn’t fair game. But the fact that everyone’s criticizing her with NO HARD EVIDENCE THAT SHE DID ANYTHING WRONG, that’s irritating.

I’m sure it is under investigation. But if there was actual hard evidence of fraud or unlawful presence or any of that, they would have published something documenting that; as is, it’s all “Questions Plague Melania Trump’s Immigration Blah-Blah”.

That is exactly applicable to a B-1, though. B-1 is business visitor; B-2 is tourist. The application and renewal processes for them are exactly the same.

BUT THERE’S NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF MISCONDUCT (YET). At best, we have a bunch of armchair immigration attorneys coming up with scenarios under which she MIGHT have been unlawfully employed or MIGHT have committed immigration fraud, but no actual evidence. So there’s no hypocrisy, because there’s no evidence she did…

What visa is that? Even a B-1 business visitor visa allows work in the U.S. as long as that work is performed for a non-US employer; so for example, if she worked for a modeling agency outside the U.S., which was then paid for the work she shot in the U.S. (and this is how models are often paid, through the modeling…

“But still, yes, it was illegal.”

Meh. Obviously shouldn’t lie under oath, but I don’t actually care whether she has a college degree or not.