“If my attorney said some shit like that I’d fire him.”

“He also took a shot at culinary school graduates who refused to start at entry-level positions. “Never, in any of those years, not once, did anyone walk into my restaurant — any American-born kid — walk into my restaurant and say, ‘I’d like a job as a night porter or a dishwasher,” he said. “Even a prep cook — few…

Except that it assumes that corporations have ways to monetize you at their disposal that they’ll choose not to employ only until the going gets really rough. And that’s a patent fallacy. Here, even if absolutely nobody were using AdBlock, Google still would have have rolled out YouTube Red if it meant earning more…

Given the complete uniformity of the comments agreeing with the ridiculous title of the post, it’s clear that any even remotely dissenting voices were silenced on this blog long ago.

“She needs to give up that dream like yesterday.”

Gee, it sure was big of Anna to bury her apology 9 paragraphs into a piece whose title and first 8 paragraphs concentrate exclusively on the actions and failures of Rolling Stone. Bravo, that takes a lot of courage.

She buried an apology in like the 9th paragraph of an article that concentrated on the actions of Rolling Stone. I've seen nothing to show that she ever apologized to the actual people that she ripped without cause and her apology doesn't come close to being sufficient.

Since you didn't cover it here, I assume you're in the process of preparing a lengthy article calling Trevor Noah a fat shamer, antisemitic, a misogynist and all around total asshole.

"The whole "investigation" was made at the request of UVA, not at the behest of Jackie."

Nothing quite like burying an apology in the 9th paragraph of a blog post whose title and first 8 paragraphs concentrate exclusively on the actions of Rolling Store ... that must take a lot of courage.

Yes, you buried an apology in the 9th paragraph of a blog post, whose title focuses exclusively on the actions of Rolling Stone. You never gave the apology anywhere close to equal dignity to the original article and I don't accept your apology.

I also hear people also call it "SFO" and it's like, no, that's the airport code.

There's a lot of problems with Uber, but one of them is service to the disabled and poor people. Basically, cabs are required by law to provide service to the disabled and they're also obligated to go to the bad areas of town. Uber basically cherry picks the good clients, while not being under any obligation…

Except that Nacho was part of the biggest Spanish pop-rock band of all time: Mecano.

"The 2014 incident cannot be used to prove that Mr. Robinson assaulted a police officer on March 6, 2015. The two incidents are not related."

Like most of the other Jezebel cop shooting stories, it's up to the people in the comments to leave the details that the original article omitted. Here, the original article included the apparent fact that the kid was unarmed. The original article did not mention that he might have attacked the officer

This felony is a pretty dangerous one sometimes ...

Oh goodie, we didn't need to wait a day until we were able to peel off more layers of the Jezebel onion ...

Jezebel's cop shooting coverage is like the layers of an onion. Today's the first layer where they post a video and rack up a bunch of clicks. We'll see what tomorrow does or doesn't bring, but if history is any indicator, it will bring something.

It's mind numbingly irresponsible for Jalopnik to be running an article that purports to give an expert witness causation analysis in a fatal accident by someone like Jason who doesn't have anywhere near the credentials to do so and isn't in the slightest bit qualified. Jason doesn't have access to the vehicle or…