Yeah, have you ever just sat around and thought to yourself. "Maybe that's just a lame Gawker blog cliche like 'blaming the victim' or whatever and that my point actually didn't hold shit for water to begin with?" No, I know you haven't.

Again, take a look at the blood stains and after that consider the location of bullet casings and then tell me whose story is utter and complete horseshit.

"At the time of the stop Johnson and Brown were not doing anything. Not running, not terrorizing, not threatening, just walking. So yeah, they weren't doing anything."

Yeah sure, but that doesn't address the issue of whether this grand jury made the proper determination based on this evidence. And if not, what did they screw up?

On the issue of whether the officer had a reasonable fear that his life was in danger, the grand jury considered evidence such as blood stains that reached an ending point and his body was found 20 feet closer to the officer, indicating to investigators that he turned around and then approached the officer. Any…

Let's say the prosecutor hadn't thrown the case and bear in mind that the grand jury heard 25 days of evidence, totaling over 70 hours and 60 witnesses and, based on that, couldn't even meet one of the lowest standards in the criminal justice system ("probable cause"). But, let's just say that he hadn't screwed…