hadrianoimp
Hadriano
hadrianoimp

you must have advanced kids. I couldn’t read in preschool.

Michelle Obama went to a school and read Seuss, was that an empty gesture?

who did Melania appoint? You know if people were shitting on Michelle Obama based on her husband’s policies the same people here would be up in arms.

While I don’t think the letter was the way to respond to a gift from FLOTUS, I completely agree with your points on her strong argument being undermined by her Dr. Seuss attack.

Of course they should be taken into account when evaluating both career and individual. His body of political cartoons are very interesting to a lot of scholars because of the contradictions of racism on one hand and anti-racism on the other. Still, I don’t think that is reason not to include his children’s books,

I agree that they are everywhere and it is unlikely that a high performing school woudl need copies. I don’t think “antiquated” is that fair, the messages are relevant to today and they are designed to help kids learn how to read.

“BUT fuck you to the first network who signs him.”

I’m predicting Megyn Kelly given her first week of shows 

He did caricature the Japanese in political cartoons...of course they were the enemy where some level of exception has to be made. It is further clear that he later regretted it.

someone stuck in the greys is telling me not to post here again? Whether or not she thinks she needs Dr. Seuss books is as irrelevant as your personal attacks on me. I guess when you don’t have a real argument you can always find an ad hominem to fall back on.

Here my initial list:
1) it was just plain rude. I was raised to say thank you to a gift even if it was one I didn’t want. I didn’t respond with an attack on that person. If Obama had sent them you know she would have just said a polite thank you.
2) it was a gift from FLOTUS, she doesn’t set policy nor did she hire

You’d be hard pressed to identify me as a “new person” criticizing Trump. The reason is that whenever anyone criticizes someone criticizing Trump they are automatically presumed to be a Trumpet

I don’t like the Trumps, but wow this librarian is a piece of work.

nothing we do will change how she is resting. She is dead.

While there is perhaps a dominant archetype, playboy playmates were not cookie cutter. Many were not silicone enhanced. Take Pamela Anderson, she is completely natural in her first appearance. I don’t think she then got implants to get another shot at Playboy, she did it because culturally it helped her career.

His girlfriends matched what was already in the magazine. I suppose you could say it is a chicken/egg conundrum, but I find it hard to believe for example after decades of bush he sought out to have them shaved to start a trend. Going bare existed far before Playboy started showcasing it.

I don’t buy that. The magazine just went with what was considered ideal at the time. You can see how the centerfolds appearances change dramatically over time.

Getting it “taken care of” was never a problem for rich people regardless of legality of abortion.

you depth of chemical knowledge wouldn’t fill a wading pool. Seriously, get some books and read them.

You seem to have it all backwards. Not surprising. But hey you have cute gifs! I’m surprised you use the internet. Aren’t you afraid of all the EMF’s?

clearly science of any form is not your expertise. But please, continue to tell us how all pesticides are just like Agent Orange. You can also tell us how almonds are just like Zyclon B.