I think you just went to the wrong one. That said, taking video in a strip club should make anyone persona non grata

“to a product that seems to have nothing to do with said ethnic group.” 

I thought I was the only one who didn’t understand why they were calling it that with a white as white Naomi Watts...that to me is more offensive than the term itself.

maybe part of it is the general refusal to participate in society by many? It is hard not to be disenfranchised when you refuse to participate.

well if it is on Wikipedia...

though maybe also white people shouldn’t decide what is an offensive term for other people.

I thought it was called Foreverware (but maybe more than one brand)...a fun day in physics class was putting the Geiger counter up against a nice orange dinner plate

all true, but the main reason the guests didn’t die in days and Litvinenko did was because he ingested it so that the alpha particles could damage tissue while the guests were mostly exposed to alpha particles that didn’t penetrate their skin.

Uranium is not super toxic, people used to eat off of uranium coated plates. Plutonium on the other hand will kill you faster from the chemical composition than from the radioactive decay.

Radium though, to be technically clear, is not a gamma ray emitter.

well the guests were probably fine as long as they didn’t try to eat the polonium.

Your analogy is so devoid of the facts that we should be saying Fuck any American who makes opinions without actually knowing what they are talking about.

though maybe not for what looks like a WWI commemoration event.

ok, I get it, I’ll leave you to discuss the completely irrelevant aspects of the story

except that Elvis didn’t really want to marry her but was threatened by her, her father, and Col. Parker.

That they could have chosen any brand name is not relevant to the liability question. That at the time it had only sentimental value is also not relevant to the liability question. They chose the one associated with a company that they were minority party to. They may very well have used the brand in pitching the show…

you seem to care quite a bit though

In most states LLC’s do involve fiduciary duties. Texas does allow you to contract out of them, but we’d have to see the agreement. I wouldn’t sign on to one of them.

“I’d bet that the Magnolia brand had value to the Gaines, not TLC”

This is sorta the whole point and why they are suing Gaines not TLC 

actually it is quite analogous. One party has material information that they are acting on to the detriment of others to whom they have fiduciary obligations.

“As long as no one is harassing anyone else, where’s the harm?”

Well there’s the problem, they often are harassing people.  

I’m sure you are fine with insider trading as well.