hadrianoimp
Hadriano
hadrianoimp

learning something new today...I thought HPV generally was asymptomatic that most people get it without ever knowing (other than the increased cancer risk). All the more reason to get the vaccine (aside, as the father of a small boy, I wonder why they only seem to want to give the vaccine to girls)

I wonder why there is only a civil suit for breach of contract. From the complaint the crimes were ongoing to 2015. He should be in jail, not dickering over millions that probably won’t significantly impact his net worth.

I agree with you, I just like to look at some of the positive changes even if the big co’s are so slow to change themselves.

probably not unless she can prove he knew he had them

well we will have to disagree there. I’m an IP lawyer and probably half of my startup clients are founded by women, POC, or both. I’ve been in the valley a long time and this has never been the case before.

Some make it, many don’t. That doesn’t change the fact that it is encouraging.

though since we are using anecdotes, I’ve done work for a VC funded startup whose founders are both women and asian. You might be surprised at the number of stratups that break the mold even if the big corps are seriously underrepresented.

wait, does it say they don’t have a diverse production crew?

Well yes and no. They are spot on that it is overwhelmingly male and if you are making fun, as you note, it should reflect that.

I agree. I was thinking mostly along the lines of how they are not the best venue to handle these types of cases, but I think you make an excellent point regarding the punishment not fitting the crime and the consequences that can have on contributing to the idea that it isn’t that serious a crime.

To me the better alternative is to refer the accuser to the police and provide them with as much support as possible. A university judicial council simply isn’t equipped to decide these cases were the stakes are high for everyone.

The communications are simply facts that exist. What creates reasonable doubt or not is how they are interpreted in a given case. Who’s account in view of those facts is believed? Who has more credibility. Are their other statements consistent with, for example, text messages exchanged. By themselves the don’t prove

You don’t give up do you? Despite the fact that nothing has changed. 1) please post a quotation of me saying he wasn’t expelled for something that wasn’t egregious. All I have ever said is that we have no confirmation as to what he was expelled for. Funny how you keep missing that.

So, we now have another anonymous

who exactly is authorized to give permission for “all of native americans”?

Would you really though? Does that mean the movie the Ten Commandments really upsets you too?

to what end though? She is writing fantasy about actual witches and wizards. Unless native Americans actually believe in witches and wizards, what was consultation supposed to produce?

Did we hector Dan Brown for discussing sacred catholic traditions?

Whatever happened to the old school peepholes that had a metal disk on the inside of the room that you had to rotate to look out?

and basically what people were posting on Jez when the first story broke on the verdict. Can we get joint writing credit for this article?

There may be ways to make it work, but it is questionable enough that most firms stay away from it. My firm (amlaw 100) has never engaged in such an arrangement.