Sounds like you are one massive hypocrite. I bet you 20 bucks, you would have zero problems what so ever using a ring video to convict a criminal but god forbid they have access to YOUR ring to help do the same thing.

Yeah, I read about that. The facts, as reported, are that they received some statistical data. None of it was directly tied to particular owners or even specific requested address ranges. Ring now doesn’t do this, but, even if they did, nothing that article reports on directly identifies a single individual. This is,…

Having been a cop I can say with near certainty that law enforcement agencies aren’t looking at anyone’s video unless they’re actively investigating something deemed worthy of investigation. 

More than anti-Ring, the site is seriously anti-law enforcement. Which is funny, because they’re much into gun control and gun confiscation, things for which you need law-enforcement. And don’t get me started with the Green New Deal thing, which Gizmodo loves. Just think of all the policing that will need to be done…

Man, this website has a serious hard-on anti-ring, has for almost a year now. Pretty absurd honestly. I love mine and really don’t give a damn about any of this, nor do the vast majority of owners. 

As the owner of a Ring doorbell in a city with police partnership, I don’t see what the big deal here is, Adam. I do live in a fairly liberal city with a, typically, well behaved police force, though. The one time footage was requested, so far, I declined because it was obvious I didn’t catch anything worth while. I…