hackeryii
HackeryII
hackeryii

Job creators at work!

Agreed. I have a mild allergy (or some kind of intolerance) for shrimp. Just shrimp. I won’t go into anaphylaxis, but I get hot under the collar, itchy, and my digestive tract gets completely steamrolled. People treat it like I’m some kind of picky eater, but I eat basically all other kinds of shellfish and seafood

He’s a quack as far as all this diet shit goes, but he’s apparently an accomplished surgeon, and he’s teaching surgery.

Much as I don’t care if my plumber is a shitty electrician, I don’t care if my surgeon is a shitty nutritionist.

Pandering to whom? People who accept gay people?

News flash: that’s “pandering” to a majority of the nation, bordering on a supermajority.

It’s times like this that I miss Suri’s Burn Book.

At least they can look forward to a 20 K game before he blows his shoulder out and turns into a character in a baseball movie starring an aging Leo DiCaprio.

It's 30 or whenever you have kids, whichever comes second. You hang on to your youthful vitality a little longer if you have kids later.

If that’s true, they should probably examine the Rules of Evidence a little more closely. Even an offer to pay medical bills is not admissible in a civil proceeding as proof of fault or liability. A judge would not allow that, and would probably be very suspicious of the party who tried to rely on that as their

Ump actually calls one of Drew Storen’s innumerable strike three pitches a strike and the Nats advance to the 2012 NLCS.

There are also cheese-mongers and hate-mongers.

You've got the alien war all wrong, Drew. If aliens come to Earth to try and conquer us, the whole Earth will be a freaking battlefield. It's not like when America goes to war and everything happens far away, and we all keep our emotional distance and watch a little CNN now and again. Aliens will be

OK, but Skyline still is undefeated in the category of "looks like a horrendous gastrointestinal explosion."

The systemic oppression and marginalization of an entire group of people is "minor" compared to theft?

You're just trolling now.

It was invoked, but not relied upon to decide, Windsor v. U.S., which struck down the Defense of Marriage Act. The majority there relied on the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

All of the current marriage equality cases invoke the Equal Protection Clause, under the theory that (1) LGBT people are a protected

Merriam Webster:

Common has an Oscar. Somewhere Bill O'Reilly's head is exploding.

Gawker Media needs a retail version of Kitchenette to run a BCO-like column. May I suggest calling the column "I'll Check In The Back"?

The only way a point like this wouldn't occur is if the monk briefly ceased to exist at some point, precisely when he would have crossed his own path.