guywhothinksstuff2k
Guywhothinksstuff
guywhothinksstuff2k

See, a lot of season 8 was just (as you describe it) 'inactive', rather than unbearably bad, which is what I found season 6 to be, with its weak villain, weak plot and weEEEEAAAAak twists. Season 8 was just a lack of good rather than an abundance of bad, so-

So, to clarify, you didn't like it?

Season six was terrible, season seven had a cracking first half but a poor second half, and season eight was underwhelming up until its finale, which was horrendous. These were the three seasons Scott Buck was showrunner for, even though he had been involved since almost the beginning. It was never out of the question

I'm a bit of a completionist too and I was on course for the whole of the MCU, despite both seasons of Daredevil leaving me fairly underwhelmed and having a mixed response to Jessica Jones (in short, JJ, Kilgrave and Luke were awesome, everyone and everything else was horribly bad). I fell off Luke Cage around episode

Hey, I'm not going to defend one by the other's flaws. Both are pretty terrible in places, even where both have some incredible episodes.

My reason for suggesting Angel was more of a main character on Buffy (for his duration) was because the story and Buffy's journey relied on him in a way that it never really did on Spike - it was even addressed in Marsters' interview that Joss just tried to move him where he was needed for other stories, without a

Yeah, I get why they changed it too, but I think going for that kind of snappiness over something evocative and specific may mean they have a 'cooler' title in the short term but it will hurt the longevity of the brand. Ten years from now people will still know what 'Monsters, Inc' was about while they will struggle

The Bear and the Bow. It was the working title, it's specific to the film, it sums up both the main images of the piece and the central conflict, using metaphors for the two main characters and their relationship. 'Brave' tells you fucking zilch - and, even worse, has absolutely nothing to do with the film, aside from

Ah, I see. No, no-one's picked Angel as their favourite character yet - but in how many TV shows/franchises is the main character or main love interest anyone's favourite? In fact, when you start making the favourite character the centre of a franchise (eg. Joey, Jack Sparrow, Gene Hunt) that's when things get very

James Marsters did - sort of. He did say he thought Spike could perhaps get there eventually, but based on the runtime of the two shows Angel was the one who she should have been with.

He seems like fun. But season six is, indeed, uneven to say the least. It has some great episodes, some great sequences and moments and some fantastically fun ideas (How do you top a god as the big bad? A trio of nerds!), but it has some dreadful episodes and some horrible subplots in there too. Buffy's storyline is

Some great titles really do get depressingly squandered, or cast aside for blander titles *cough*Brave*cough*. You're right that Buffy the Vampire Slayer is a great title, with the central conflict and irony laid out right there.

Yup, that's what I meant.

I dream of that for different reasons.

This episode was okay, but I was disappointed at the focus - it's the finale of the season, maybe the series, plus it's set at Josh and Lucy's wedding… and the focus is on their parents? This never felt like the central couple learning to make it on their own, it felt like it was about the parents learning to let go

And maybe Henry Cav- no, never mind.

Wait… surely dinosaurs didn't urinate? They're closest genetically to birds and reptiles, neither of which produce urine (all their waste gets converted into poo).

So no review of Man Seeking Woman tonight?

Came here to post literally the exact same comment. Wanna be best friends?

Uhh… sure.