gutsav0--disqus
Gutsav0
gutsav0--disqus

"That's what she opined."
Hmmn. You're right~!

He's excellent - and very hard to kill - in A Perfect Getaway.

You haven't seen him in drag?
* Goggins *

Keith Carradine rocked his recurring role in Deadwood. Just a random shout out which I feel is perfectly justified. Need I ask if you see what I did there?

Jehovah's Witness call it disfellowship. So? Big deal. Blackmail? Where is all the dirt on Paul Haggis, then? Step back, widen your frame, else participate in a moral panic. Scientology, silly as it is in its core beliefs is, I maintain (and this is only my disinterested opinion) a largely benign organization

Yes. Action. Spectacle. Budget.

Elementary features Sherlock on TV in NYC. Sherlock features Sherlock on TV in London. Robert Downey Jr is Sherlock in one Sherlock cinema franchise. And, very soon, Ian McKellen will essay Sherlock in a 4th simultaneous, separate Sherlock production. If Dr Oo can't encompass simultaneity even better than that,

Membership? Nonsense. I am guessing that SP stands for something nasty in scientology. True or attributed, I wouldn't know because I am only curious about the responses, here, to the phenomena of scientology (real or perceived). I am only quietly responding to what strikes me as a hater, crusader mentality, a

What do you mean by "poor" but "symmetrical". Is this formal logic? Math jargon? Is "Scientology is power, like any other religion" a false equivalence? You seem to me to be using slippery, ill-defined language which invites others to jump on the scientology bashing band-wagon. Let me say one more thing

Useless tautology.

Not false equivalence?

I don't know what you mean by "You left out one world government."
Of course we are talking about it here because the site posted something about a film or TV show but very little of the discussion here restricts itself to criticism of the TV show qua TV show.
No equivalence intended. Rather I am pointing out that

Cuz I missed the last train to Clarkesville.

The only reason we are talking about S is because celebrities are involved. Through the lens of celebrity we magnify out of all proportion our critical passion for this trivial subject, I opine. The cynical calculations that vested interests make as to what constitutes safe food, drugs, drinking water, and automobiles

Not based in any recognizable human reality. Dreadful.

Locking people in a basement doesn't define a cult anymore than locking them in a night club or in a factory, or a jail. It defines power. So what. What's your point?

Oh, dear, Scientology persuades rational adults in a free country to make certain choices. Scientology is about as threatening as advertising. It's message is about as complex as the power of positive thinking. And it's history has none of the horrors of the old established churches. Give it a rest.

Of course! Why would I stay for Frank Zappa after having seen The Monkees?

What exaggeration? That study is of no use whatsoever. It is a demonstration of statistical insignificance and of experimental flaws too numerous to list. Tying my shoelace is like solving three Rubic's cubes while juggling them in comparison. Good-night!

Nonsense. I love Damian Lewis, but Claire Danes is superb. As is Mandy Patinkin. Having said that, I don't know where the writer of the article is getting his information. But a faked exit? Sure. Why not.