He’s just playing victim.

Still, Loeb made the baffling case in a New York Times op-ed last spring that he’s been unable to have kids because two of his ex-girlfriends had abortions.

Here’s the other thing I hope the court takes note of:

If both parties are required to consent, what legal basis would he even have to make her sign it?

I don’t understand this. How is he able to bring this to court over and over? What do the two abortion gfs have to do with it?

I really don’t understand some straight people’s obsession with having biological children. Like, what’s wrong with adoption? Could someone explain this for me??

Lol. Oops. It’s been a looong day!

I also wonder if it’s an attempt to leech off of her fame and/or (despite his protests to the contrary) put her on the hook for child support (assuming that would even apply in this case).

Controlling and abusive narcissist asshole. He has money oozing out of his pores to provide for a willing egg donor in addition to a surrogate so it’s not about having a child, it’s about hurting and exerting force over a woman who rejected him and moved on. Only other controlling abusive narcissistic assholes would…

And I’m totally sure those women exist. Loeb dated them when he was at summer camp, and you totally can’t meet them right now because they live in Niagara Falls but rest assured they totally texted Loeb every day they were bf and gf.

To be fair, I’ve never heard of a male getting pregnant after his ex has an abortion.

I’m missing something.

Dude, for fucks sake just find another woman willing to have sex with you.

Eh, jail, not so much, but hopefully the judge lifts his leg, gives a big wet fart at Mr. Loeb’s excuse for not revealing the names, and dismisses the case.

If he gets away with this criminal mess (this is some advanced level stalking/extortion),  the inevitable demon child must be named Leopold Loeb.

If he’s gotten two other women pregnant as he alleges, then that suggests he’s not unable to procreate/infertile. How is this not thrown out of court already?

I think he’s claming he’s been “denied” children by all these mean old harpies.

So his case is that he can’t find a willing mate? Seriously? He is rich, he can find an egg donor and surrogate, but I think this is more about trying to interfere in his ex’s life than his desire for children.

Ms. Vergara, I hope your lawyers can get this settled or transferred to another country’s court - you don’t want Vice President Pence testifying on your ex’s behalf.

Wait. What? Am I missing an important part of sex Ed where we were taught that if a woman (women) have an abortion the man can no longer get pregnant?