Well it’s how your post read, as all the replies to it show.

I swear this dead horse will come back to life if I just beat it a couple more times. 

Everything you said. For god’s sake, this show was good, the reference to “purity” is just insane, and I really don’t get why they might expect him to do this in perpetuity for free. 

He's not selling his soul. It's a goddamn tv show, and it's his job to make money off such projects. I sincerely doubt anyone at Jezebel wouldn't jump at the chance if CBS (or even some third tier cable channel) offered them a deal based on the snarky Jez videos.

After reading this article, and I do respect the particular writer a lot, I don’t know anymore what Jezebel considers relevant information when it comes to Reade accusation? Even the Politico piece referred here isn’t exactly what the article depicts it as as it focuses on the fact that Reade has had an alleged of…

Jez writers seem to be overwhelmingly pro-Bernie, and probably believe that if Reade's allegations force Biden out of the race, it will allow Bernie to ride in on a white steed to take over the nomination. 🙄🙄🙄

Not to mention that there are multiple confirmed cases of Trump paying people to level false accusations of sexual assault against his enemies.

A pattern of grifting is a pattern of grifting. And it taints anything else you do from that point on. This isn’t Monica Lewinski. This woman was writing articles swooning over Putin just last year. There’s all kinds of red flags here. She has a pattern, Biden doesn’t. Guess which one looks more suspect here?

Are you fucking kidding me? Please take another shot at smearing criminal defense attorneys who represent people accused of sex assault when you know absolutely nothing about the law. If you bothered to do the bare minimum of your job, you would know that defense attorneys cannot just bring up evidence of how the…

I don’t know. We seem to be bending over backwards to find reasons why we should believe Tara Reade. Mostly centered on “believe women,” a concept I support. And I know that there’s a lot about how “real victims” behave and how damaging that is—so we shouldn’t factor in her character, which is that she’s a lifelong…

This blog.

Another thing I saw others saying in relation to the article was that she owned a ‘personal’ horse and kept it at these various horse sanctuaries/stables, so how could she possibly have been in dire financial straits? Not that this has anything to do with the price of tea in China, but these are the points being…

Without any record of complaint, corroboration and an ever-shifting story, I think it's within bounds to look at her motive for this story at this time. The next piece of the puzzle is her history of money troubles and conning people. And a GOP that's willing to pay people to lie. So now, let's just see if she's hit…

I honestly cannot figure out why Jezebel keeps defending this lady. The best investigative journalists have followed up and can’t confirm her story. The Obama campaign vetted Biden thoroughly before making him the VP. They wouldn’t miss this if it was real. Everything about her allegations feel wrong about what people…

I’m not sure this article really tracks with what Politico was doing. To go public with a sexual assault case against a powerful individual requires one of two things: evidence, or a leap of faith on behalf of the public.

The “aggrieved acquaintances” were but a handful of former landlords. The damning behavior behind the trumpeted claim of dishonesty and wrongdoing? Reade allegedly struggled to pay her rent, and sometimes she pleaded for her landlords’ sympathy.

These incidents further indicate she has a habit of lying. Also the fact that she spoke highly of Biden back then, and used it to ingratiate herself to people. 

“Never having struggled, never having been dishonest, and never having spoken positively of an alleged abuser.”

Are we allowed to not believe people?  Asking for a friend.