I’m baffled by the response to this post. Are people really that jaded that they can bag on Sony after the past few years they’ve had? Boo fucking hoo, they didn’t show 8 new things you haven’t seen before. It’s not like 9 of the 10 best console exclusives of the past 18 months have been on their console. I don’t…

Lol. Don’t mess with nintendo fanboys. They’re immune to sarcasm or jokes.

The shit?

the believe the last part of the trailer where the blocks are falling in a rhythmic fashion is actual gameplay.

If they can make Wipeout amazing in VR, and not vomit inducing, Tetris should be fine.

Kotaku:

This game seems to have been panned by most major reviewers, but I enjoyed it. Was it perfect? No. But it was a perfectly enjoyable title.

for 99.9% of the other games it means little to nothing, to get Red Dead II up on your stage at E3 and start throwing around the word exclusive it means a lot more to non Kotaku like site readers. It’s a rare swing game that if you were Microsoft you wanted to avoid this at all costs.

Do you have a source on Microsoft’s public disavowing of timed exclusives? I can’t find something to that effect with a cursory google search

I mean, don’t get me wrong, I dislike most things about PlayStation, but remember that the ENTIRE Rise of the Tomb Raider was XBox/Windows-exclusive for a year

... , exclusivity sucks.

It’s amusing when people get discredit for using the internet. Something that has been around for almost 2 decates now and the majority of western civilisation uses it. But for some reason you think it “disconnects” us and that’s why “we don’t understand” well... You know that the only thing I don’t get is, have you…

The “problem” will sort itself out when no one buys this. You’re playing right into this guy’s hands. How many people have now heard about the game through free viral marketing? It’s funny how people can make shooting games about any other setting and people wouldn’t bat an eye. But hey, let’s do the truly American…

Yep, I don’t understand why games can’t be made about the most horrific events. Games are art and art needs to be free to talk about all events, especially horrific ones.

The world didn’t end when Super Columbine RPG came out. It won’t end if ths game comes out or even if it does well. It is tacky and tasteless, but better that it is out there than we all jump on the Moral Majority train to ban what offends us.

Okay, I’d say is this is a disproportionate amount of outrage.

At least as long ago as counterstrike became popular I guess? Half of that game is literally playing as a terrorist either holding hostages or trying to blow something up.

I’m pretty sure Rainbow Six Siege involves at points playing a side that is literally trying to murder millions.

Other than the fact that people get…

I disagree on the expressing of it. If you play through the story again, some of her choices of words are very obviously referring to Baldur. As well, she forces Atreus to burn the mistletoe arrows for seemingly no good reason because they can actually hurt Baldur. For me, it’s satisfactorily there the whole time.

I felt completely the opposite about her last few minutes on screen. Precisely because she is shown to be wise and balanced, the emotional breakdown just highlights the depth of her loss.

I couldn’t disagree more thoroughly.