gschristopher
shadowling
gschristopher

I don’t have any problem with that statement. Scientology is a crappy religion, but I don’t doubt that the rites and ritual bring some members a great deal of comfort. I’m not sure why we would pretend that its myths are any less or more valid than those of, say, Christianity or Islam.

The Anker stuff really is just that good. I’ve slowly replaced almost all of my USB stuff with Anker products because they’re head and shoulders above everything else in their price range.

The Anker stuff really is just that good. I’ve slowly replaced almost all of my USB stuff with Anker products

I think it’s humorous that D&D was designed by people who were conservative Christians, especially given the “Satanic panic” of the ‘80s and ‘90s over the game.

I think that people on the Right have a widespread and, frankly, unhealthy obsession with the idea of SJWs and ‘radical leftists’ when they barely exist. They are certainly an infinitessimally small portion of the Left and have no political power. The fact that you leaned into talk of “microaggressions” and classified

Also, SJWs do not exist. You might as well concern yourself with fighting unicorns.

I question not only the likelihood but the commonness of something like this. Your third-wave feminist sounds more like a character than Broland. I’m not saying these people don’t exist, but the idea that they basically destroyed your D&D group and no one said, “Look, just shut the fuck up and play or don’t, but

My horrible oxygen allergy is really starting to cause problems now that I’m in my 30s, too.

...and I’m Eric!

Wait, this isn’t a Trump article. Damn it.

Oh, right. I forgot that the ‘Church’ of Scientology is all nutjobs.

I’m sure his lawyers will. What a nutjob.

What’s the likelihood of them showing the dreaded Tom Cruise episode?

And she was smart enough to marry a wealthy dingbat twenty years her senior who isn’t on trajectory to become the world’s most hated human being. (Take that, Melania.)

Linton is definitely an effigy of the Trump administration: she’s a completely clueless person born to wealth, but can’t afford class, and the highest-profile gig she’s ever had in her “acting career” was a bit part in a CSI: NY  episode from 2007. If she wasn’t endowed with her daddy’s money, she’d be out on the

Just a daily reminder that money can’t buy class.

The obvious answer is that most people don’t believe a noted feminist trailblazer has actually been a horrible womanizing ogre his entire life based on angry accusations.

I mean, according to his very angry ex-wife. Because people never say nasty or untrue things about their exes after a relationship ends.

I’m also confused as to why we’re taking his ex-wife’s word as gospel on what a schmuck he is, given that she has already taken the low road and turned their private issues into a tabloid side show.

I respect that, but I think that one of the biggest difficulties we face on the Left is the constant urge to very publicly police how everyone else fights for our ideals, especially if they are white. It undermines efforts and makes us look completely disorganized.

The most damning part here is when he tried to characterize the Nazis there as mostly “good people” with only a few bad eggs.

As part of the settlements, can someone demand that their tagline be changed to “Fair, balanced, and incredibly rapey”?