@Bitsbite: I can't tell if you're serious so I'll answer both scenarios:

Looks like something a media student would make as a project. At which point I say nice job, give him a B and some pointers.

Misleading article title is misleading. Again.

I have for some time now noticed that this is the norm, rather than the exception. The only reason I am still here is that I have yet to get into the habit of frequenting a rival site like Engadget.

@SBP1: I believe that was an obvious sarcastic jibe at Apple.

I always have one of these in my bag, absolutely perfect.

I always have one of these in my bag, absolutely perfect.

@cloudwalker_3: [www.amazon.com]

@xredgambit: This is exactly what came to my mind.

@jinchoung: The only example of your three that is correct is the handicapped man's right to access.

@FrankAguilar: The price of the iPad is already fantastic in my opinion. It has been low enough that "competitors" have struggled to beat it effectively.

A London-New York/New York-London flight of under 3 hours would seem ridiculous today because you'd spend nearly twice that time in the actual airports...

Any most viewed lists should exclude music videos.

@Leon Rigsby III: Why would you even feel the need to post that? :P

The Minneapolis Star Tribune article is hilarious. It reads like complete spoof (which it may be intended as?) - check the quotes in the article.

@mclainr: Ooh, I hadn't even considered that.

@KiwiLord: Thank you, I was going to post this.

@BoscoH: Whether your assertions are correct or not, I don't think it matters.

I really don't understand the backlash against commander Scott Kelly in the comments.

@HeroOfTomorrow quit smoking: It is contradictory AND redundant usage.