Glad that you’re open minded about the site, and I agree Cecilia asked some great questions!
gross
gross555
Feminist Frequency never called for tearing down anything old, or even stopping anything new. It called for increasing the number of new things that are inclusive.
“I don’t immediately jump to molesting her. I wait 10 years. But so we’re clear, I’ve called dibs on that.”
Schilling looks like the truck driver at the counter in some diner in the middle of nowhere ready to tell you how the world REALLY works, which they aren’t gonna teach you in some fancy college.
Not localizing something is not the same as banning it. Thanks for playing!
That’s what feminist frequency is calling for too, though. For there to be MORE female and queer representation in games, and for more of it to be positive. She states it in almost every single one of her critique videos.
Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself.
I keep wanting to tell these people that it’s ok to enjoy things that are problematic, but at least admit that there’s a problem. I mean, B-PROJECT was a trashy show, but I enjoyed the hell out of it. Just as an example.
I get pretty tired of some people using “censorship” as a reason to stop discussions they don’t want to see other people engage in.
Great interview! It’s upsetting that Amelia has to so blatantly (and repeatedly) state that she’s not advocating censorship. I expect there to be quite a few comments that cry censorship at her though.
I can only speak to my own field, but the physics prize is pretty garbage this year. The math those three outline is very interesting and might lead to something cool, but there are a lot of people who believe all the materials phenomena we’re looking at that are candidates are just surface effect garbage. In other…
HEY FRIEND. WOMEN DIDN’T START WRITING ONLY IN 1901. There have been women writers creating excellent literature since ages, maybe fewer in number but again, excellent and remarkable work. The fact that it is lesser in number contributes to men’s work being considered more important.
Buddy. Friend. look at the tweet embedded in the article. me saying women should have more that 14 out of the 144 nobels in lit is not the same as me asking for men to be blacklisted from the awards. but you stay feeling threatened, boo.
a. the idea that they should give it to a woman “just because” only makes sense if you think that the literary output of women is somehow inferior both on an individual and collective basis.
I tried this once in a game. It didn’t end well. But then again, I was playing soccer.
They have this new feature on Deadspin which allows you to scroll down and not have to click every article if you are not satisfied with the topic. You should check it out.
GO BACK TO JEZEBEL, MAN-HATER.
Husky and Starch
“Painfully attractive” “cruelly attractive”