grima1
Elgondalin
grima1

thats basically the main part of why this petition is taking place the last paragraph and he only started getting aattacked after he called the game a toilet that fails at being one so is a urinal on his twitter. 4 years of hardwork from Naughty Dog this attention seeking is bound to be met with people calling him

its to take off a score that was never put on by metacritic, and this shouldt be called a review most people believe he hasnt played the game just like when he reviewed bloodborne without playing it

nope it doesnt, most believe he never played the game like when he gave a review of bloodborne, believe that has started again since all he comments on is the games detail being unnecessary and nothing about gameplay. So yeah it makes me think hes watched this game and made an uneducated but this time clickbaited

its not adult to call the game a toilet that has to be used as a urinal because its one whole too short. Read his twitter, thats when all the hate started. And there was no score given on that so called review but it still is added t 40, metacritic stated that they gave it 40/100, thats not true, it was unscored and

the reviewers credibility is a joKe. He dies not review the game at all just attacks the series with miNdless comments like the detail is unnecessary and his credibility is absolutely awful considering he never played bloodborne when he reviewed it also.

na the story is nowhere near formularic for video games, i doubt youve actually played A Thiefs End

this is like half of what the petition is for, to take that score off also

There is a difference with apparently disliking the game and judging it accordingly and calling the game a urinal that was meant to be a toilet without actually mentioning anything regarding the game in his review accept that the detail was unnecessary, probably because he watched t rather than playing it. He has a

this article is so unwell educated on the whole matter it almost comes of as biased as that so-called review. The game had no score given yet was added with a 40/100 on the site. Most people doubt he actually played the game as he also never played Bloodborne but reviewed that game after watching youtube gameplay

Im the guy who tweeted that, and washington post did not give it 4/10, seriously the score was not given yet metacritic wrote that a 4/10 was given, possibly because they were confused with the other 4/4 review that was done on the website that wasnt from actual staff. Therefore there was no score yet they