Yep not surprised you'd resort to that course of action when your argument is really shit (something which you had to edit in after I made my reply) and clearly your cognitive dissonance is getting the best of you because you *really* don't want to acknowledge the evidence that supports his predatoriness. Oh yeah it's…

I would call that pretty shitty logic to equate what I've said to any random even that he's written about. Your analytic skills need work. You must be pretty obtuse if you don't think a person's neuroses or fixations can be channelled into their work. He's written about incest and molestation pretty consistently…

Never got around to seeing this reply. The details I provided you were specific enough for you to just google it. But here is one excerpt: DORRIE:

"Stardust Memories" (1980), an exchange between Sandy and Dorrie

I gave you plenty of instances of these the red flags, your choice to ignore them does not negate them and invalidate my argument. Yes who are you to say this is not possible to have a marriage with someone who is groomed, we are talking about a very rich and powerful man that has instigated relationships with many…

I would never spread the lie that he adopted Soon-Yi, I like to stick to facts. So you're saying that because there are no other reports that he molested other underage girls that somehow invalidates Dylan allegations? I've reached my conclusions by reading all the pieces of evidence myself, not because I want to jump…

Just because he wasn't charged with any crime doesn't mean he didn't do it. What experts? The prosecutor believed he had probable cause to press charges against Allen but didn't want to put Dylan through the trial. There is also evidence that Woody Allen had inappropriate behaviour towards Dylan. There are so many…