1972 Nova built from the ground up with "sleeper" as the only goal, 1100 horses.
Reptar
greggdonica
He was the first, well only, person that comes to mind. Just wonder if he can drop that much coin... I know he's rich but he is no sultan.
What vehicle was this tested in? And will the experience differ based on the vehicle it is used in?
That can only mean one thing...
Now playing
Right here on Jalopnik.
I almost Cruized right by this article without giving it a look. Glad I didn't.
It may work to an extent but that doesn't change the fact that it is lame. I sure as hell wouldn't do it.
Dimples.
My thoughts exactly. Such a joke.
Compared to some of the car crashes reported here on Jalopnik alone, i would say at [b]first glance[/b] this does appear to be just a "boo-boo".
Agreed.
best one yet!
I'd rather have the flat blue paint on and center lock rims (not necessarily those pictured) on the stock RS.
I'm sure it has plenty. And i'm sure 99% are NSFW.
I have a tendency to use crap very loosely; probably not a good habit. Often interchangeable with "stuff", "things", etc... In this case, "any part of a car that is not the engine", with the engine only be one of many very important parts of a vehicle.
Yowsers! What Audi does that menacing front end belong too?
Yes, you are correct. That's what i was referring to with weight distribution in my initial post. Engine mounted between the axles usually leads to much better handling abilities. Another good example, the Ferrari 599. It has better weight distribution, plus i'm pretty sure it was the only way to fit the engine up…
Yeah, it was very ambiguous. Always trying to throw up my posts in a quick fashion, being at work and all.
Oh yeah, its definitely obvious there's a lot of necessary and important things going on under the engine bay; the suspension can only go one place, by the wheels. I just always think of lifting the engine bay to showcase the engine, ya know?