Rare is not the same as desirable... The manual transmission obviously makes this better than an auto, but doesn't make it worth more than half what he's asking
Rare is not the same as desirable... The manual transmission obviously makes this better than an auto, but doesn't make it worth more than half what he's asking
Was not going to comment on the weird spelling but since you did... Yeah, where are the editors?
“The price is terrible but lower it by 25% and get a completely clean inspection and maybe... So NP.”
Why didn't I vote? Because I fell asleep just looking at this car. How am I commenting? It's like sleepwalking but for CP.
Surely they were all automatics though, so what's the real loss?
Lol solid reason. I think for MR2s either you love them and any price is NP or you don't really care and anything over 5k is CP, which probably explains a lot of the price fluctuations, but this is a top/close to top spec model in very decent condition.
I feel like you can do better, but this car is still just an automatic NP for me at anything under 30k. Irrational, but true.
Toy car jalopnik is high quality jalopnik
No interior shots, no mileage, potentially questionably rebuilt engine, Crack Pipe.
It’s not too far off, but the price is too high to really be considered nice. Take off 3 grand and you're there
Torch, is everything okay at home?
If I lived in California I would 100% have hopped on this opportunity to make my list of cars somehow even less practical
I read the headline and saw the picture and naturally substituted “911" with “Boxster” due to the price and front end. This is a massive NP today, amazingly low price for a clean 911
I’m 6'0", which I understand is somewhat less long than 6'5", but I have all kinds of room in my 86 to lean back or push my seat back from where I normally sit. And it's great for all the things he wants to do. Obviously no back seat usage if you do that, but who uses those anyway???
Say it with me: No bailout for FCA.
I think there's absolutely zero chance of that... If they're switching to a Toyota architecture, and they get rid of the Subaru engine, why are Subaru still involved?
I’m not a big fan of turbos in general but definitely not with how loose the car is already willing to be.
Toyobaru news is the best news - thank you. If it's turbo and not hatchback I'll stick with the one I have though.
It’s because of the weird Ø in his name. It just naturally makes you a superior driver.
No bailouts and maybe shareholders should think about firing the executives who got them here (and maybe suing them for criminal mismanagement as well). Would it be that bad if the major players died off and we had a huge set of new and innovative small businesses enter the marketplace instead?