greaterdivinity
greaterdivinity
greaterdivinity

Why do they need to be feminists or have their ego stroked? I'd think that any rational, reasonable person regardless of age, gender, race, sexuality, or whatever would be unsettled by graphic depictions of sexual assault or gore.

THEY'RE ALL ATTACKING ME, I TELL YOU! THEY'RE ALL OUT TO GET ME AND SLANDER MY GOOD NAME!

Probably because nobody is buying it, at least in the West.

I don't need to play it to know how the tablet interacts with various games. That can be showed off in gameplay demos. I'm not talking about the quality of the games (since I haven't played it) but simply how the tablet controller is used in the games, which in general it's vastly underused.

Can you explain why the police rolled up to a candlelight vigil in SWAT gear?

Can't say I have, as I don't have a Wii U (yet). But I've been watching the games that come out for it and watching for cool gamepad interaction since I think it's the only interesting bit of any current gen console.

And with Teraway, Media Molecule has done more with the PS4 controller as a method of interaction with a game than Nintendo has done in 2 years with any of their Wii U games and the tablet gamepad : /

The two are not so different : )

Dunno, seemed pretty expected to me. Running around with a bow killing locals with a knife seemed pretty standard. Locations seemed pretty expected. Seemed pretty expected overall.

Most innovative box ever.

Yup. WTB on PC.

Totally thought it was Heavenly sword until her sword looked way too small. Oh well, cool trailer.

When it inevitably comes to other platforms, I'm just going to pirate it for PC. Fuck this kind of exclusivity, even timed, bullshit.

Well, I guess that means I will end up only playing one proper Tomb Raider game , because there's no way I'm getting a current gen console in the near future, and definitely not an Xbone.

It's pointedly and obviously directed at a specific group that is going to have an "enjoyable" reaction, which this article feeds into. Go to any site aimed at a specific group and there will be easy and obvious triggers for said group to get them to react, because the folks doing this care less about the group

Then I'd have to write "causes for specific groups". "cause specific groups" is gramatically correct, as I'm stating that the groups are specific to a singular cause.

Apparently not, care to enlighten me? Is it the focus on "I"? Because I'm speaking personally, not for anyone else, so "I" makes sense in the sentence.

Seems to have been edited, because I remember a reference to how the images were offensive specifically to women when I made my comment.

What is? A statement of fact? I'm not calling out all feminists here, there are a huge number that do fight for everyone and want equality and egalitarianism. However there are also those that don't give a rats ass about anyone who isn't "them". I don't like any cause specific groups on a conceptual basis because I'm

I agree, but that's being bandied about as something that would "fix" the situation, when it more than likely wouldn't. By all means, get it in place (though realistically, I have no clue how Gawker sites are set up or the challenges that would be associated with putting an IP ban in place), but don't act as if it