gravelordneat-o
Gravelord Neat-o
gravelordneat-o

Daly’s comment makes MY brain hurt. Ice causes concussions, the boards don’t? Are you fucking dense? That’s one of the single dumbest things I have ever heard a human being utter in my life- and I’ll point at my screen name for proof that I hear a lot of stupid things in my day.

1. SBIII proved the AFL could play with the NFL, which was unfathomable.
2. Namath represented a countercultural antidote to the stodgy-ass NFL.
3. He was the first big-money QB, which forced the NFL to pay better.
4. He transformed pro football into a TV spectacle.
5. He was brash, and open about being brash, at a time

That first AFL Super Bowl win helped legitimize what was at that time a lesser league and paved the way for the merger.

I do believe that. But he won a Super Bowl, and even if he sucked after that, he’s arguably the most consequential QB in history.

That fruit wasn’t even hanging. It was on the ground.

Pittsburgh: Hold my beer, Boston.

However, the sexual assault during the Red Wings game did not occur between periods.

Roethlisberger has thus far been unavailable for comment.

Pittsburgh would have been on the road under the old playoff format. This one’s on you, Bettman!

You read my fucking mind. The Orioles didn’t start this shit, didn’t continue this shit, but they may have to be the ones who end it.

“How did your date go?”

“Phew. At least it’s not gambling.” -Roger Goodell

Their team hashtag (#BearWithUs) doesn’t inspire confidence

Glennon probably is pissed, yeah. He really stuck his neck out to sign with Chicago, and that’s no easy feat for him to do.

No one said a polygraph test was the only due diligence performed (regardless of its evidentiary value in court), and you have no idea (nor do I) what due diligence was performed. And no one can argue the contrary either. I don’t expect straw man arguments from you, Barry.

Mixon didn’t commit domestic violence or sexual assault so why is he in the headline? This article is nothing but SJW clickbait. It says NOTHING.

No it wasn’t. The topic of the article had nothing to do with Joe Mixon and she only used his name to get clicks.

I mean on the one hand I absolutely think that we should be doing everything we can to discourage domestic violence, but...

What is your evidence the van driver was “oblivious?”