It’s unbelievable to you  that a newspaper like WSJ would actually have an opinion piece that has a take that differs from your highly regarded one? Isn’t it just his opinion & why does it matter if it’s an idiotic one? I think the paper may actually try to balance it’s takes and that’s OK. It’s getting old the way…

Why can’t anyone ever acknowledge the fact that Kaepernick’s largest problem stems from his hyproctical actions and seeming lack of formed opinion on the topic.