I assumed he was repeating what she had explicitly said. I read, “doesn’t have the patience,” as, “is uninterested in dealing with the bullshit.”

Wrong.

It’s legal to hold someone hostage? Crazy.

Yup. Slender and fit, but I’ve had big boobs from pregnancy, and now they’re not just smaller, but deflated. It’s just, wtf happened here.

How many women working in porn wished they could use condoms, but have no say?

Wouldn’t one hope?

I just thought it was crazy that she was comparing passing numbers and saying they wanted to work with him, with “inappropriate” behavior.

Ftr, also not cool to talk about wanting a bj from your co-worker, with your other co-workers. You don’t know the half of the shit people said directly to her, and it was indeed egged on by what y’all said when she wasn’t around.

Ginsburg doesn’t even think Roe v Wade was the right way to approach things. She doesn’t agree with everyone about all the details, even when she has the same ultimate goals. I think her words were harsh. This isn’t new that she doesn’t agree with how everyone goes about things, even when she agrees with their…

Bullshit ruling.

Thank goodness. For no reason. Just, a Swift song came on in the car today, and it just made me think of how weird it is for them to be dating. Why am I thinking about this? If they break up, the world makes a little more sense again.

Such cases are in the extreme minority of states, and I would absolutely prefer that the laws in such few states to include the typical age-difference exceptions, than to change how we view statutory rape as a whole.

The problem is that people are going the opposite direction, of acting like it’s “just” statutory rape. Please remove the “just.” It’s a crime. It should be a crime.

A 20 year old screwing 14 year olds is a predator, and the public should be aware of it.

You know how rape convictions are incredibly low? Sometimes the only thing you can prove, is age. Some of the cases where a man was “convicted of consensual, statutory rape,” the original charge was that it was not consensual. A conviction doesn’t state was certainly happened. The conviction states what could be…

Not realistic in most places. There tends to be an allowed age gap of 2-3 years when one of the participants is under the age of consent.

18 year olds should not be having sex with 14 year olds.

No. They are not rewarded when they ask for what is rightfully theirs.

Recent studies show that people find it off-putting when women negotiate for more money. They will look at you negatively for even trying, while they men will actually success with the same approach.

“My grandma bought my grandpa new pants and my mom asked him how they felt and he goes ‘like a cheaply made castle’ and we were like what and he goes ‘no ballroom.’” SHOW US YOUR BALLS, GRANDPA!