I'm going to go ahead and disagree with Mr. Moore here. It is certainly some artists' jobs to do that, but other artists are in it for the money. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
I'm going to go ahead and disagree with Mr. Moore here. It is certainly some artists' jobs to do that, but other artists are in it for the money. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
I have but one issue with this whole thing: the supposition that all 4 of the women cast in Ghostbusters are funny. I assure it is not based on gender or sex when I say this: Melissa McCarthy does not make me laugh at all.
Or less. It depends on the library.
I couldn't get through the first episode of the first season. It feels zeitgeisty. Has anyone watched it since? Does it hold up now, or was it just lightning in a bottle?
Women can hold their own damn doors. I'm not dying for that.
I hated them mostly because they were irritating as hell.
Convoluted but: Burger King is also Brazilian-owned, but they moved their corporate headquarters to Toronto. At the same time, they merged with Tim Horton's, creating a single company with two different brands.
Vancouverite here: my friends wouldn't shut up about them in the late '90s. See also: Spirit of the West.
Not American owned. Brazilian owned.
It depends on when you grew up. They were a pretty big deal in the mid-late '90s.
Don't let Gord Sinclair hear you say that. There are two Gords in the Tragically Hip, thank you very much.
Not all of us. I don’t really understand his appeal myself either.
If it bothered enough people they’d change it. It clearly doesn’t.
My objection is the artificial compartmentalizing that results from publishers' insistence in pigeonholing. I think that in a lot of cases, particularly the already difficult to reach teen boy readership, they are directed to that section that is really lousy at reaching them simply because YA is for teens.
That's stupid. I'd be perfectly fine giving "young adults" ie., teens, the current version.
Wasn't this reported on the Season 1 DVD?
Anything can be suspicious if it repeatedly comes to a conclusion you don’t agree with. It almost feels like they are trying to convince you of something.
Ah. I don't know how I missed that. I would've thought I'd remember that, but I suppose not.
So a reunited Ween isn't worth an article on its own?
I don't get it. Why can they control the performances? I get the recordings if she has a deal. Is it a management contract as well as recording?