Older 4Runner or a 2002 (with the 3.5) or newer Pathfinder.

That thing is going to age worse than the final generation Celica.

2. Your 2005 Lincoln is essentially a car that was developed a decade earlier, meaning you are currently driving a car that was technologically developed in 1994-95. here we are in 2018, 23 years later and car makers have done a tremendous job with updated a) safety, b)technology c) emissions/efficiency .

Early skirmish in the robot uprising.

That’s not an SUV, it’s just a big car with a nice interior and a meh exterior.

The new one’s styling just looks comically busy and fussy by comparison; it’s going to age as well as the final, seventh-gen Celica.

I just bought an R50 Pathfinder; I reject your premise.

But you don’t need to carry tools or spare parts. :D

What are you going to do when you get to Moab?

Dammit... so good.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar

The only way to forget the Sienna is if Toyota wises up and brings over the Alphard or Vellfire. I would buy one.

We already have region/market-specific cars. All this means is that US will still get the inefficient muscle cars while the rest of the world will get the cars which meet their standards.

Paul Blast did the absolute worst use of ‘did’.

Reading articles you aren’t interested in is redundant...oh the irony.

Of course the blinkers work, they were hardly used.

Its impossible to argue with your logic.

POTD

And that’s why I’m buying a 2006 MDX; it’s a Honda, it will live a long time.

I want Fett’s Jet Vette.