goscuter1
goscuter1
goscuter1

I'd take the bullet and I'm not remotely joking. I get vertigo climbing up onto a chair. I cannot even conceptualize...I'd just be like, "Shoot me." No dilemma.

my mother, who has been married almost 50 yrs to the same man

It would seem you're the victim of malicious conditioning by your mother. We all have been badly abused in this way, but girls are definitely more victimised than boys. I can't imagine why girls' mothers have a motive (ahem) to condition them to be averse to sex, sexual paraphernalia, sexual imagery and even sexual

And doing something nice doesn't warrant a woman giving you some ass. In short, don't do something nice expecting a reward, in this case ass. Do it because it is what you wanted to do.

Chris is your stereotypical Nice Guy (TM) in that he demands perfection in women, proof of a high IQ, and "refuses to settle for some skank." (Because there are only two kinds of women.) Once a month he posts these long-winded diatribes about how he has been waiting 39 years for his life to start and how the women

He is dishonest? You clearly have never met and / or know nothing about women. He is being honest. All the honest women are dead.

People with good lives don't need to be validated.

Lawdy, won't someone think of the infantilised women, fighting that Glass Ceiling? Poor dears.

You know you live in Polite Society right? Where truth is rude and deceit is diplomatic? Women know the truth is reprehensible. Some of their deceived BOYS feel the same way.

I'm offended that my offensive pretext to justify the genocide and enslavement of defenceless children offends you. Now I have a pretext to kill you too.

A person, regardless of outward appearance or size, has a right to pose in underwear and feel good, proud and deserving of respect, and if it offends your ears and sends you into an offended tizzy, dredging up feelings about your judging mother, the problem is not with the skinny lady in gym wear. It's with you.

In Polite Society, only truth offends.

I have been shaking my head for so long, determined to reach the first positive comment. You nailed it. They're shaming a successful woman.

For that reason.

Haters hate their betters for being better. They imagine it makes them look bad.

She wouldn't have a sob and demand for you to be banned from Facebook for offending her with your graduate degrees, so there is a far greater problem than immaturity corrupting your perspective.

Is there a rule that restricts when I'm permitted to respond? I do so when I can, but if there is a law or religious more that limits my courtesy, I've not been informed. I'm unemotional about it. You seem to have a lot of contrived problems you rustle up to give yourself an opportunity to nauseate the world by

I'm personally uninvested but from the PoV of the drug kingpins and warlords that dictate to NATO, I'm pretty sure they perceive the Drug War as an (ongoing) victory.

War profiteers only lose when the war is won. As long as it rages on, they're winning. What I don't know is whether they've ever lost (failed to meet

But as I understand it, Desoxyn is methamphetamine. It seems to me the US doesn't have a Desoxyn Problem so they cannot have a Meth Problem. They must - inexplicably - have a Substitute Poison Sold As Meth By Criminals Working For The Government Problem? I don't understand. I haven't a clue what toxic chemical

Let me make this easier for you.

Yeah. Like NATO.

Psychiatrists don't like to prescribe it because of the stigma associated with the poisonous substitute for meth sold on every government corner.

You like that logic? Where I live 4% of the entire nation used poisonous substitutes for Desoxyn in the last calendar year. Millions of people. The carnage wrought by these