gorygoryhollylujah
Hollylujah
gorygoryhollylujah

Agreed. It’s one of those things that’s so easy to get wrong. Hence why so many non-separates are all custom.

Yeah, that’s not what I meant at all. It’s not like they’d look at them and say, “meh - too fat, too skinny.” I’m talking about actual medical professionals to evaluate their health and see if they just happen to be very skinny (some women are) or if there are other outsides forces (bulimia, anorexia, drugs, stress,

I’m with you. As I age, my body becomes somebody else’s body. My old body allowed me to eat A LOT and gain weight very, very slowly, while also allowing me to be active. This body gains weight if I smell food, while still being ravenously hungry, with the added insult of being tired and in pain from injuries if I do a

Little known fact Houdini was just two super thin models in a man’s suit.

I’m glad they are revising this law. Just hope they have a discussion with models and fashion execs alike to explain why this law is in place. Unreal body expectations begins in childhood and continues all the way through old age. Presenting young girls with images of rail thin women reinforces the ideology that the

I get what you are saying, because technically I am overweight.

Yeah, but they can all just slip right out.

On the plus side, they’ll be able to fit all the banned models in a single jail cell.

I did not, the question is; do I want to?

Now playing

This administration has been actively working to poison confidence in government

Freire told the Washington Post that the EPA might consider industry scientific experts for these positions as long as there are not conflicts of interest.

This administration is not going to be happy unless every single thing on this planet is ruined - and then they will be angry that there is nothing left to ruin.

But you just know that the moment that they start trying to pass their own rules, and liberal groups weigh in during Notice and Comment, that they’re just whine about how the process is super unfair to businesses because it allows all those groups to have a say as well. They are hypocrites and they don’t give a shit.

They act like there aren’t plenty of opportunities for the “regulated community” to weigh in on regulations, including the NEPA process and the proposed and final rulemaking process required of every regulation. It’s hardly like they were being ignored.

Scientist 1: “That stuff gives people cancer.”

Ok. So from a conservative/pro-business perspective, I can understand appointing 1 or 2 industry reps to serve on the advisory board, where they would work alongside scientists and policy experts from the EPA. I would oblige a conservative executive branch that; it’s reasonable. But this horseshit is fucking criminal.

So the cleansing of knowledge from government continues, Idiocracy here we come.

“But how do the foxes feel about being kept out of the hen house? We should disregard their feelings on the matter?”

Pruitt’s chief of staff Ryan Jackson told the Post that members could reapply for their positions. “I’m not quite sure why some EPA career staff simply get angry by us opening up the process,” he said. “It seems unprofessional to me.”