Without her parent's knowledge? Fine. But why would she hide that from Sterling and from Alexi? Why would she ask Alexi to drive her to the pier and wait for her all night, and never tell him what she was doing, which was being a maid? She would share her deepest secrets with him (Stan is not her father, she hated him…

2 or 3 episodes ago
Stan to Janek; "I want you to kill who killed Rosie."
Then after that:
Janek to Stan: "Here's how your daughter really died. You should find who killed her and kill him."
last night:
Janek to Stan: "You should forget about your daughter's killer."

Isn't it great how the fact that Richmond solicited underage prostitutes doesn't even register anymore? Isn't it great that instead of just releasing that little detail they had to all out frame Richmond for the murder in a way that the defense in his eventual trial would clearly see through?

You know what is unbelievable? How they copy themselves in near exact form with the Bennett and Richmond storylines. A lot of what bothered me with last season's finale wasn't that we didn't find out about who killed Rosie, but that the Richmond story was nearly identical to the Bennett one. Now we go one step further…