I know. I’m not famous (like super not famous) but the idea that it’s cool for a company to be like “Hey, Sehjma, thanks for ordering <potentially embarrassing thing> from us!” all over their social media is...not cool.
I know. I’m not famous (like super not famous) but the idea that it’s cool for a company to be like “Hey, Sehjma, thanks for ordering <potentially embarrassing thing> from us!” all over their social media is...not cool.
Who is Rachel Maddow? (That is sarcasm, I do know who he is ). If a tree falls in the woods, and MSNBC is the only one around to broadcast it, does it still make a sound?
I assume you mean the opposite, but are afraid to say it. I do understand that rand scares prissy liberals. What would a person do if they were responsible for themselves?
I’m thinking his assignment was to write a post trashing every candidate as they drop out, and he had to stretch on this one because he secretly looooooves Rand Paul.
Racism isn’t a factor in libertarian theology. I am sorry you have been jaded and are now discriminative towards people who align with libertarianism because of your past experiences with racist douchebags.
You’re focusing on Rand Paul here, which is fine, you don’t like him, he was the focus of Albert’s post, okay, whatever. My question, I guess, is how would you classify someone who believes in the free market, a limited government, fewer foreign military entanglements, and the freedom to sleep with/marry whoever you…
You realize that rational decisions and accountability are not unique to libertarians right?
I’m curious why you think libertarians are the worst people? Are rational decisions and accountability bad things?
Mr. Burneko, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may…
That’s because this article is 0% substance.
I still think the survival of the GOP stems on them being able to adapt to what the Paul’s started. A libertarian sense of fiscal conservatism, the libertarianesque approach to social issues, and some refocusing on some of the power to the states.
What did I just read? You can use all the big words you want in your writing, that doesn’t make it logical or sensible.