Well, suck on it. The last VP of diversity was fired because people lined up with pitchforks for her having the gall to even suggest that people may think independently even if they have the same skin color. The backlash to that was deeply racist.

career merits of the big men who play a game with a stick and ball

You realize you’re not protecting anyone by saying “’Skins” instead of Redskins, right? You’re not committing some great act of heroism by cheekily pretending the name doesn’t exist. And in case you think you’re some white savior for native americans, do notice that they are not as offended as you want them to be

You’re apparently also a millennial who doesn’t understand the concepts of statistics and averages.

LOL yeah how dare she defend somebody accused of a crime. While we’re at it let’s abolish defense lawyers. They’re rape apologists, after all, because as everyone knows, no non-guilty person has ever been accused of rape.

Yes, be afraid of everyone! Fear everything! Build a wall. They’re coming to kill you.

Also, you got scooped by a better journalist. That has to burn.

Why is the thread whose lead comment with (currently) 750 stars lower on the page than this one, with comparatively very few?

It’s also easy to confuse them because they are both real journalistic entities. Unlike this website, for example.

Now I’m no psychic so I could be wrong, but I believe it was a simple mistake.

This article is a big “ends justify the means” argument, with absolutely no consideration for the corrosive side-effects of the “means” here.

Good one. Thanks for highlighting his point about why your company is useless.

The revelation in Thursday’s New York Times that comedian Louis CK acted sexually inappropriate with two women comedians was not a revelation to us here at Jezebel. In 2012, Jezebel’s sibling site, Gawker, ran a blind item

LMAO. Guy is arrogant/confident — obviously a player and or misogynist. Guy is the opposite of that — must also be trying to hurt you.

Well, while we’re on the subject of grammar,

My position isn’t that it is somehow illegitimate to defend one’s freedom of speech. I’m not even commenting on the lawsuit.

I find it interesting that you were willing to refute NAMBLA-membership, but on the question of KKK-membership, you have continued to be silent. For some reason you did not feel the need to disavow the KKK, and we’re all wondering why.

Yeah, people who get bullied are selfish assholes too. Why are they so concerned with their own well-being, while they could selflessly commit themselves to making their bullies happy instead?

Not positive, but don’t you think it’s unsettling that she hasn’t condemned them? I mean, morally decent people should be against NAMBLA, yet we continue to hear only silence from Swift on this issue.

Interesting. You haven’t said that you’re not a member of NAMBLA. Do you refute that charge? If not, I have to assume it is true.