It sounds like you’re referring to Swift and her lawyers as the “oppressors of free speech”. Correct me if that’s wrong, but I don’t see litigiousness as a center-left phenomenon. People across the political spectrum sue each other for libel all the time.

I’d give you the benefit of the doubt but I have to be mindful of Poe’s Law . I’m sure you understand.

The sad thing is that the progressive commentariat fully endorses the witch hunt.

Why is it her responsibility to be political? Why does her being famous mean that she forfeits her right to privacy? Why does one pay a social cost for vigilantly enforcing their right to privacy?

It’s not even guilt-by-association. It’s worse.

The tactics of these odious groups (specifically, claiming someone who has yet explicitly condemned them as “one of their own”) to gain publicity rely on morons to take them seriously by reacting is ways such as “Hey, YEAH, she never actually said she wasn’t a member of NAMBLA. She must tacitly approve of what they…

What everybody gets wrong about this is that they believe that the protests must be viewed according to the terms laid out by the protesters. But why? The anthem and flag are symbols that mean different things to different people, and people may feel strongly about these symbols. That’s precisely why they decided to…

This is some racist, ageist bullshit.

To have this opinion, you must be an uneducated (perhaps willfully) moron.

“Whaddya mean the laws of gravity don’t allow me to fly? Fuck off, Newton.”

When Donna Brazile was accused of giving Hillary debate questions, she was Hitler to the Bernie people. Now that she writes a self-serving, opportunistic, op-ed that aligns with their political views, the Bernie people suddenly love her. Shocking.

To these people, to be accused is to be automatically guilty. Or, to be concerned about runaway witch-hunt style persecution is to be personally defending/endorsing the worst criminals. These people have no understanding of principle or fairness.

This is a blog and should not be confused with an actual publication. Grammar and facts are meaningless here.

The “intersectional” types aren’t fans of them either. Y’know, cuz to be Jewish means you control the media and enjoy killing brown people, apparently.

What, she was mean to some people on twitter and now the DEEP STATE along with the ILLUMINATI has decided that she must be stopped, so they mobilized their PUPPETS in the SHADOW GOVERNMENT to take her out?

Is that you, Alex Jones? Yes, everybody is just making it up. No reason to suspect terrorism. Why, everybody says “Allahu Akbar” when killing people, what’s weird about this? It’s just because he’s brown, right? Nope, definitely nothing to do with his beliefs. It’s all a setup. A conspiracy. Just “weaving the…

Riiiight. That’s why they did it. Because he’s brown. Nothing about him screaming “Allahu Akbar” after murdering a bunch of people. Nope. No way to ascertain that perhaps he did this for ideological reasons. Definitely just because he’s brown.

You: “What if we don’t automatically take the least generous interpretation of everything someone says?”

It was probably white privilege.

“If you criticize the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, well, obviously you’re against democracy”