...Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, may himself have been influenced by toxic masculinity, which she describes as “a specific model of manhood, geared towards dominance and control. It’s a manhood that views women and LGBT people as inferior, sees sex as an act not of affection but domination, and which valorizes…

The same people who accuse the DNC of rigging the primary against Bernie/trying not to let him run now want the DNC to officially do the same thing to politicians that don’t support their preferred positions. What happened the letting the voters decide? All of a sudden the establishment is your friend?

No, the logical conclusion is that people should vote on the totality of a politicians positions, and the substance of their policy. Rather than disqualifying them out of hand on the basis of a single position.

Ah, all the nuance I’d expect from a deranged marxist.

I’m generally against deporting illegal immigrants unless they commit further crimes on the basis of the cost of doing so (not just monetary, but to society), but I am fully in support of deporting these particular activists. They’re demonstrating that in addition to breaking the law, they have no respect for it. Our…

Actually, being opposed to open borders, and enforcing laws governing the circumstances under which people are allowed to enter a country, doesn’t make someone a Nazi.

Can you imagine if, upon an unpleasant experience on a trip to Israel, someone said

“In the end it’s as close to the original sin as any manageable disease...”

That is a vile form of discrimination. “All people of <group X> are guilty of thought crime. Even if they don’t think they do.”

If people are dumb enough to fall for it, then other people will find ways to exploit it.

Why would you go back to his place the first time you met him? Especially if you got the vibe that he was horny?

We’ve reached an important milestone in equality:

> Just don’t be a racist, a bigot, or an Islamophobe.

And I’m pretty when they say “inclusive” they definitely don’t mean “people with whom we disagree in good faith”. It’s too easy to cast people who disagree as being opposed to “justice”, in which case we should “call everybody racist”.

Yes, I’m jealous of the dead girl. At least she didn’t have to hear what that lawyer said and suffer the intolerable offense.

A lawyer is zealously representing his client, who was unjustifiably annihilated from this planet.

But there’s something I’d like to understand... the headline is written in such a way like “what? how could it not be a hate crime?”.

Right, right, retaliate to a religious insult with another sectarian insult. Sounds like a good idea.

It’s not mansplaining if she was incorrect and he told her the correct term. I mean WTF? How is this sexist?

Wypipo, man. What’s the deal with all these wypipo and their brain tumors?