It seems you’re arguing that we should judge people on the basis of their character rather than the color of their skin or their gender.
It seems you’re arguing that we should judge people on the basis of their character rather than the color of their skin or their gender.
This is actually honest, because that’s what politicians do. No politician — none — is speaking authentically 100% of the time because it would be dumb to do so.
There needs to be a huge asterisk here. 12 of them were caucuses, not primaries. Bernie’s supporters don’t like closed primaries, but are mysteriously silent about caucuses. I wonder why...
When someone who isn’t black identifies as black, she’s a terrible person (see Rachel Dolezal).
Just want to point out that this can be true while at the same time it can also be true that the Democrats (at least the left wing) are increasingly employing identity politics.
To hear HamNo explain it, Democrats lost 100% of the vote.
You’re right. Let’s stop infantilizing her.
Let’s play “guess the content of the article based on the headline”:
You mean like how Bernie, who is not a Democrat, did this in 2016 and is currently doing this to the party now?
Or maybe Warren, Biden, Franken, Sanders, AND Cuomo and Johnson can all participate in the primary and let people decide who to vote for?
No one forced the Red Sox at gunpoint to overpay Sandoval...
What’s the actual number? Is there data on it?
Mowing down her opponents.
It’s getting hard to keep up... what are we supposed to be outraged about here? That a woman was forced, at gunpoint, to take a role in a movie in which she plays an older person?
It’s a fucking translation, keyboard warrior.
Triggering on particular words while ignoring the overall context, which is stupid on its own, is especially stupid when it involves a translation.
Technically, but the culture remains. They can call themselves whatever they want, but they’ll never be able to wash off the rancid stench of Gawker.
Yes this was a case of mistaken “reply” button. I meant to reply to the to the article itself (in which the author intends to dictate what is and is not funny), not to your comment.
Thank God Gawker is around to instruct me on what I am permitted to find comical and what I am not permitted to find comical. God bless Gawker.
She probably was. Another rich person gets off scot-free while ordinary people suffer the carnage.