I don’t see anybody saying (or even implying) that the compliance of the model lets the perv off the hook. The legal citations are not necessary.
I don’t see anybody saying (or even implying) that the compliance of the model lets the perv off the hook. The legal citations are not necessary.
Harassed and exploited? Entirely the decision of the harasser/exploiter.
Ah yes, there it is. Except it is not at all victim blaming. Stop shaming people for asking reasonable questions.
Why not the surprise? One can hold the following two thoughts in their head at the same time:
Yeah, and for some reason the author of is rattling off a bunch of hackneyed old gay stereotypes. “We knew you were gay. You went to a bath house. Gays go to bath houses! Judy Garland! Also gay!”
“It appears the Golden State Warriors tried to win by scoring as many points as possible.
Whatever. What did this guy do to earn your hatred?
+1 supreme court justice
Why do both these guys have douchey rings?
It really seems Hamilton is just incapable any self-reflection whatsoever.
?
*Colin Kaepernick makes noise about politics*
Is he on a contract?
Agreed. Men are bad for not speaking for what it’s like to be a woman. But then, if they spoke for women that would be evil too.
Actually, I think all white people are terrible and evil, period!
Yep.
I’ll admit I responded to the one comment and did not read the entire thread.
“My guy didn’t win. Bern it all down!!”
True, I don’t either, but I think the pattern there is that “Hollywood likes movies that pay homage to Hollywood”, which we saw with Argo (and The Artist, which I think was about Hollywood too? Not 100%). It’s the new Oscar-bait.
Yeah, that’s why they voted Moonlight for best picture. Beware of confirmation bias.