Is there distinction of superiority between SF and fantasy? Isn't this one of those topics students use for term papers or speakers who need to fill an hour by expounding the traits of their chosen field over another? While you can compare weak SF stories with strong fantasy tales, and vice versa, there is nothing to…

The difference between agnostic and atheist is one of knowledge and one of belief. As such the comparison to them is like comparing apples and the USS Enterprise.

The title of the article is missing something...

The Core has a special place in my heart (though that definitely isn't a statement of quality), I thought the Knowing started incredibly well but just went koo-koo for coco-puffs with the Angelic-like aliens and the Garden of Eden in the end, and while Perfect Sense was nowhere near Perfect (nor made 100% sense) the…

The man in this video died a short time later due to complications suffered in making you giggle. I hope you're happy with yourself. Remember this the next time someone makes you laugh... it'll be all your fault. :)

And that's why it should be mentioned! :) Besides, the author of the article, she loves her obscure geekdom she does! :P

I... I need to be alone with the trailer for a few minutes. I know it's wrong, but oh god, it feels so right... :)

Sweet Merciful Zeus... CthulhuTech lives! :)

Watch his TED talk. He prefers mystery to answers. He must absolutely hate the fact that we get an answer at all.

Tonto /subscript and the Lone Ranger

Possiby not... AND if they are trying to ground Supes a little, to allow this to be the first of the JLA-run up movies, then excluding the more fantastical end of the Kryptonian science might work well.

Oh crap... I just remembered how impressed I was with the trailer for Sucker Punch... please be good, please be good, please be 180 minutes of awesomely good...

Source matters, and with a stereotypical liar as Hook has been portrayed, one can't tell anything. One doesn't know anything, to any degree of certainty except that Hook had the bean when the story needed him to have the bean. His motivation for taking it was completely different than required, so by happenstance…

"Oh no, I was wrong, it was earth all along. You really made a monke..."

With this and Jack Reacher coming out next year, I'll have to work doubly hard to forget Cruise is a scientologist!

Peter's plans were to win. To kill Windward. The "love" aspect stopped Peter's plans from winning. (admittedly, he wouldn't have won outright, but it would have been a decided victory for them).

There are significant, and increasing, differences in what the Observers were said to be capable of and are actually capable of. For example, what's a truth church and how does it effect Observers? Why would observers allow such places to exist if it impedes their virtual omniscience?

Any effect act of resistence is likely to draw retaliation, whether it be killing a general or screwing with the economy in the shape of (unlawful) strikes or mass bombings. The greater the effect of resistence, the greater the retaliation. Yes, it's a vicious circle, but it in this crucible in which the resistence…

Ask any historial resistence movement if taking out a general type wouldn't be a fantastic idea. Peter knocked off some other Observers. Call them Lieutenants, call them stooges. Windmark isn't a stooge (as currently portrayed). And whether or not he is replaced in a minute or a day, his replacement will be a little…

Olivia's terrific line ended a paragraph which started with a contradiction. She previously had expressed condesending doubt about the freak's powers, and then she says she absolutely believes her. Indeed, Olivia's materialistic statement was then contradicted in the end when "love" fucked up Peter's plans you... ya…