i feel like the distinction is pretty easy to see. If someone suddenly feels attracted to a postpubescent person who is under 18 and would never act on it, no big deal. If the same person suddenly finds themselves attracted to prepubescent children, it would be worth getting an MRI or otherwise investigating the…

I’m of the opinion that character creation rolls should all be replaced with point buy systems. Players should be able to create a character by themselves from start to finish without being tempted to cheat.

I think there’s some wiggle room between making things up and perceiving things in a skewed way, which seems possible here.

Giving a lifetime supply of anything to a terminally ill anyone seems almost dickish.

I’d switch Pizza Hut and Papa Johns in Bob’s list, but I think it’s because Pizza Hut’s crust is so buttery. Hungry Howies is a weird one, because I like it better as long as it’s hot and fresh but it plummets to the bottom once it’s been put in the refrigerator.

Even Domino’s is superior, I think you mean.

Each time I’ve seen the title I’ve thought of this right before I move on to hating the weird punctuation in the title. What’s so impossible about this fallout?

I kind of assumed they were both inspired by the research done at one of John Lilly’s labs, where a woman lived with a young male dolphin while she tried to teach him language.

Pretty sure I remember him wearing a lot of MAGA hats.

Picture Kim Jong-Un but with more mugging for the camera and Peanuts dancing.

I’ve noticed that dubbing instead of subtitles is a lot more common outside of the US, which makes me think that most people everywhere just don’t like subtitles for whatever reason.

These seem like fair sentences for people who likely acted without malice. I get why you, and especially the parents, would call for longer sentences. I just don’t think it’s obtuse to consider the fact that this may have not been caused by greed or willful neglect.

Yeah, a way better mantra for the #metoo movement would be “I support women by treating their accusations as credible while pressuring the powers that be to investigate,” but that’s kind of a mouthful, so people just say they believe women.

How does spellcheck not catch “weekand”?

Yeah, I would have preferred it too. The flashbacks were still part of the whole afterlife hand-wavey Babel fish thing, so it would’ve really drove the point home to people who remembered the pilot that they were alive again. No big deal, though. I wonder what the “some kind of explanation” will be.

I don’t really care enough to believe or disbelieve, but I do care enough to say that it’s shitty that he thinks he can keep her dead father’s guitar after they’ve divorced.

It seems like he’s aware that nobody was ever going to be sympathetic with him not returning a family heirloom after the dissolution of their marriage, so he came up with a story that only sounds plausible because it’s Courtney Love.

Yeah, not sure I agree at all about it being the best way to go for this very reason. I’m excited to see Sam Black Crow, though. Her speech about belief is really my favorite part of the novel.

The concept of identity politics didn’t bother me so much at first, partially because it was framed as an anti-apartheid sentiment when I first heard it but mostly because there are serious issues with voting based solely on your own circumstances. I have a co-worker who voted for Trump because she lost a job to…

And they love to bitch about the welfare state when every single one of them is costing us a huge amount in medical care, even the rich ones.