Size wouldn’t be a factor in momentum, just mass so saying “smaller” as a factor itself would be irrelevant. A smaller aircraft means a smaller wing which means LESS agility

Wing loading and thrust to weight are what matters, as long as a plane has adequate wing size and thrust, weight alone is irrelevant.

Not as impractical as you think. It was carried by a modified Tu-95 bomber, and they could have probably modified more. This was back in ‘61 and even though ICBS were first starting to appear, bombers were still the go-to method for nuke delivery.

That’s because of the speed of the asteroid which greatly multiplies the force. An asteroid 500 meters wide going thousands of mph would have a mass-energy equivalence probably pretty close to the weight of some moons.

It’s not wrong yet dude. I think there’s VERY little chance the Everest will come to North America, it’s was meant especially for the Chinese market, not NA. They actually specified when the Everest was introduced that it was not comming to NA and was made to cope with the harsh rodes in China.

So much this. I drove a ‘95 Bronco and the thing had a great ride, and was very comfy. It rode LEAGUES better than the Wranger of the era and got better mileage as well and more interior room.

You’re just copying what APC said in the post a couple days ago, stop pretending like you came up with it.