And welcome to the real world, where association has a cost.

Then that’s exactly where your ethics lie isn’t it?

And that doesn’t make it right. They still represent the health care industry and staked their careers on it. No one here is defending Zuck but it takes another mind entirely to bite the hand that feeds them.

You wanna fight let’s go buddy.

I’m thinking more from the perspective of the hospital who accepted his money then still went on to bad-mouth him.

That’s actually pretty close to the plot of a particular Star Trek episode.

If I need cash for my emerging business, but the angel investor who shows up to my rescue has a history of horrible acts, I would absolutely not take his money.

Let’s take a look at this for a second to help illustrate my point:

The point is - if say Donald Trump came to you and said I’ll donate to your charity, would you take the money?

No, but if you take the money, then it means that you accepted it. Would you take money from a known bad guy - which then makes you associated with him?

Yeah I get that, what I’m saying is that there isn’t anything obvious outside of the things she’s said that’s gotten her into trouble.

Yeah, but that’s not how people who might feel they’re part of a marginalized group act.

But that’s what bad people do.

So here’s my question.

And here’s my question that I’ve yet to get a good answer on. OK so a lot of people don’t like what JK Rowling has said. That’s fair.

These musings are not lost on corporations.

Right, but when the classroom is nearly empty and there’s no one around except just other people like you...it’s not the place to be.

Parler turned out to be inconsequential.

I honestly didn’t hate on the whole Gal Gadot thing. A little insensitive and tone-deaf sure, but to be totally outraged and suddenly come after her?

I’m gonna take you for a ride (jazzy music), I’m gonna you take for a ride