Yea you obviously have never driven an Elantra N. There are Type R owners who have traded theirs in for one. It’s that serious.

From what I’ve read, the reason SpaceX and until recently Tesla have been reasonable successful is they have entire teams who’s entire job is just managing Musk. Game planning every decision present so he picks the correct option instead of his ego running in zigzag circles on ketamine.

The adults at SpaceX seem to be far better at keeping his fingers away from the buttons than those at Tesla.

If you want to buy a low-miles “investment”, this seems like a HELL of a lot safer bet. It probably still won’t keep pace with the stock market, but at least it’s more fun to look at in your climate-controlled expensive storage unit than a stack of stock certificates. You can’t drive it, of course, that would hurt the…

Whoever buys that STR8 is a moron lol

Why anyone would buy this for anything but an investment is beyond me. You gotta be playing a looooooong game to get any return on it, too. Then again, most of these will be wrecked, stolen, or modified beyond repair then stolen and wrecked in a couple of years, so maybe it will work out.

I’m starting to think it was subcontracted out to the Cybertruck team

A big thing is the march of technology.

Driving this car advertises a lower FICO score than the driver of a Nissan Sentra.

ND, none of the cars from this range are worth 30k. Even the newer generation of Ghibli can be had in the mid teens.

It doesn't really exist, it's just a . . . . Mirage.

Mitsubishi sold 13,220 Mirages in the US market last year. The best sales year ever was 26,966 in 2019.

And nothing of value is lost. In what universe is that turd better than the newest used Corolla or Civic you can buy for the same price? The value proposition just isn’t there for a Mirage.

The rear ones I think you could argue are distinctive and interesting. But boy, that front end looks like a Countach tried to grow a mustache and it really can’t pull it off. Like, why does it stick upward at the sides?! What kind of monster would do that? Just let it be horizontal. Don’t put weird protuberances on it.

Counterpoint: those bumpers are god awful and look like something that should be removed after shipping.

It’s all about feel. Way back when, I was younger and possibly dumber and a lot smaller in diameter, I had a 88 Fiero. I had modified it with Koni struts, a rear sway bar, aftermarket suspension bushings and new rear control arms that allowed for more negative camber and lower unsprung weight and +1 tires/wheels. And…

15 years ago in cycling, the only tires you would be caught dead with on a road bike were 23mm, pumped up to 120+PSI. This was just how it was done. And people would argue ad nauseam that the 23s were faster and handled better and anyway they have to be better because that’s what the pros ride and the pros only ride…

“Open seating” was gone as soon as they allowed people to pay for “A” boarding. I would set many alarms to be prepared for that 24h ahead of my takeoff, but eventually I would be right on time and be “C” boarding.  So just do away with it.

This is a decision designed to appease an activist investor and hurts what made Southwest unique (maybe annoying, but also unique). It also slashes what made Southwest unique.