Charles Not So Much In Charge :-(

Not for nothing: “Dom Tullipso” is an anagram of “Mild Lout Ops”

People of good faith can differ about the pitfalls and problems of aid and development, and can try in thoughtful ways to determine how best to do the most good. The Trump team’s questions don’t have the ring of good faith about them. They sound like they were taken from a Fox News yammerfest.

I miss the days when Bill Clinton nominated Zoe Baird for Attorney General and when it came out that she hadn’t paid her nanny taxes people lost their MINDS. How’s that for quaint?

To say nothing of Chief Arch-Fiend Stephen Bannon, also late of Goldman Sachs!

1. Great catch. 2. Not only can I not even now, I may never be able to even again.

Buscemi 2020, it even rhymes!

Thank you for being a legal aid lawyer, and godspeed.

Maybe someone could also point out that even if the guy were a Clinton operative, it would not be okay to attack him or falsely call him an assassin. #toomuchtohopefor

Winning! The Game Show for Winners

That may be the single most bonkers thing Trump has said about this. He’s actually suggesting that Stoynoff and her employer, whose business it is to put out happy-talk pieces about celebrities, could/would/should have turned this happy-talk piece into an expose of his sexual assault on her. That her story could only…

It’s true that Trump has done and said much worse, but the idea that people straight-facedly accept and even defend this kind of disingenuous wordplay is simply amazing. When Clinton does it (“Why did I accept those huge speaking fees? ‘Cos that’s what they were paying!”) she is pilloried with a medieval fervor by…

Eleventy billion stars to you. I was once a legal aid lawyer and there is nothing more right than what you’ve said here. Also, thank you for being a legal aid lawyer.