, said the dude in a poorly punctuated, run-on sentence.

Did you really just post a graph that proves going for two scores more points?
How does this graphic prove that going for 2 is a bad play?

Note: You can’t change the argument to “But coaches won’t do it”. You have to stick to the original point you made, which was “Going for two is a bad idea”.

Every game is based on statistics. That’s what the score is, dude. A statistic. When teams decide not to throw at Revis or Sherman it’s not because of how they look or run...it’s because they look at completion percentages when they’re thrown at.

Also, the fact that football doesn’t use stats does not mean one cannot…